Advertisement
LIFE
Lifestyle

China's ban on puns reminds us of the power of wordplay

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
James Kidd

Imagine for a moment that Dorothy Parker is still alive. Imagine that her Algonquin antics have secured her a one-woman tour of China. Imagine her being informed by the snappily titled State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television of the People's Republic of China that puns have effectively been outlawed across media and advertising, as they were last week.

Now imagine Parker addressing her audience: "If all the bureaucrats at the State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television of the People's Republic of China Christmas ball were laid end to end …," she pauses, "they would make one long line of female State Administrators, and no mistake."

The announcement restricting double entendres - cue headlines about "pun control" - argued, not unjustly, that puns "can create misunderstandings for the public, especially for minors. They need to be firmly corrected."

Advertisement
Linguist Yuen Ren Chao played with Chinese phonology in his work.
Linguist Yuen Ren Chao played with Chinese phonology in his work.
Ironically, the emphasis on protecting children from the perils of bon mots offers a telling reminder of the anarchic and subversive potential of wordplay. Whether it is a place without rules or with its own self-defined regulations, playing with words challenges anyone intent on propagating absolutist diktats that brook no dissent much less any misunderstanding.

In the appendix to 1984 that defined Newspeak, George Orwell implied that Big Brother's beef with the word "free" was, aptly, that it could mean more than one thing: "The word FREE still existed in Newspeak, but it could only be used in such statements as 'This dog is free from lice' or 'This field is free from weeds'. It could not be used in its old sense of 'politically free' or 'intellectually free' since political and intellectual freedom no longer existed even as concepts, and were therefore of necessity nameless."

Advertisement

This anarchic liberation of meaning goes some way to explaining why monarchs and dictators alike have viewed jokes and laughter with much the same enthusiasm as female heirs and weapons inspectors.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x