Wong Kar-wai book considers his films as artworks rather than socio-cultural indicators - book review
As one of Hong Kong's most written-about filmmakers, Wong Kar-wai may not be an obvious subject for yet another book. But as scholar Gary Bettinson points out in The Sensuous Cinema of Wong Kar-wai, the culturalist approach - which looks for correlations between films and social phenomena - in writing about the director has left room for more fundamental film analysis.

by Gary Bettinson
Hong Kong University Press

As one of Hong Kong's most written-about filmmakers, Wong Kar-wai may not be an obvious subject for yet another book. But as scholar Gary Bettinson points out in The Sensuous Cinema of Wong Kar-wai, the culturalist approach - which looks for correlations between films and social phenomena - in writing about the director has left room for more fundamental film analysis.

In a beautifully reasoned introduction, Bettinson, a lecturer in film studies at Britain's Lancaster University, courteously calls out scholars who regard Wong's films as cultural allegories - in particular, Ackbar Abbas (whose 1997 book, Hong Kong: Culture and the Politics of Disappearance, represented a rarely disputed paradigm) and Stephen Teo (whose British Film Institute monograph on Wong, published in 2005, focused on identity issues).
Bettinson prefers to avoid broad cultural theories and examines the films "as artworks and as aesthetic objects". Each of the four main chapters tackles one aspect of Wong's filmmaking: musical style, visual style, narration and genre. Drawing on the ideas of film theorists David Bordwell (whose "film poetics" method is adopted here) and Kristin Thompson, and also the Russian formalists, Bettinson's close analysis of the films' aesthetic qualities is both informative and thought-provoking.
Bettinson's central assumption of an "aesthetic of disturbance" refers to his belief that Wong's works, while sensuous experiences, challenge existing cinematic form and viewer's perceptions with their fragmentary plots, their characters' moral ambiguity and the diffuse emotions they arouse. It's a slight conclusion - more or less expected from an assessment that didn't start out with a preconceived thesis.