-
Advertisement
American cinema
LifestyleEntertainment

Why From Dusk Till Dawn has aged poorly as the vampire movie with George Clooney turns 30

George Clooney’s charisma can’t mask the flaws of this 1996 gorefest written by Quentin Tarantino, from bad effects to treatment of women

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
(From left) Quentin Tarantino, Salma Hayek and George Clooney in a still from From Dusk Till Dawn. While the 1996 vampire movie remains a cult favourite among certain viewers, it contains problematic elements that do not hold up well.
Matt Glasby

This is the latest instalment in our From the Vault feature series, in which we reflect on culturally significant movies celebrating notable anniversaries.

In recent months, Quentin Tarantino has been in the news for criticising actors such as Paul Dano and Matthew Lillard in a manner unbecoming of a cinephile. But there was a time he fancied himself a leading man – or at least, the leading man’s creepy brother.

Directed by Robert Rodriguez (Desperado), from a script by Tarantino – based on a treatment by special effects expert Robert Kurtzman – From Dusk Till Dawn turns 30 this month. Although it contains all the hallmarks of a typical 1990s Tarantino crime caper, it switches gears halfway, morphing into a gory vampire flick.
Advertisement
George Clooney, still on his way to mega-stardom, plays bank robber Seth Gecko, on the run after a jailbreak staged by his brother, Richie (Tarantino). Even with a tattoo snaking up his neck, Clooney does not quite convince as a cold-blooded killer, but his charisma goes some way to masking the movie’s flaws.

Surprisingly, for those who have suffered through his cameos, Tarantino is well cast as the psychotic sex offender Richie. But compared to Clooney’s effortless star wattage, he is still, to quote his assessment of Dano, “weak sauce”.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x