Spanking children doesn’t work and creates problems, 50 years of research shows

Will sparing the rod really spoil the child?
The straight answer: no
The facts: rather than spoiling the child, sparing physical punishment can actually set a youngster up for better behaviour and development. In a new study published in this month’s Journal of Family Psychology, experts reviewed 50 years of research on spanking and found that the more children are spanked, the more likely they are to defy their parents and to experience increased antisocial behaviour, aggression, mental health problems and cognitive difficulties.

Spanking, which the researchers defined as an open-handed hit on the behind or extremities, was associated with negative outcomes consistently across the wide range of studies analysed that involved a total of more than 160,000 children, the researchers say.

“We found that spanking was associated with unintended detrimental outcomes and was not associated with more immediate or long-term compliance, which are parents’ intended outcomes when they discipline their children,” says Elizabeth Gershoff, an associate professor of human development and family sciences at the University of Texas at Austin in the US.

Co-author Andrew Grogan-Kaylor, an associate professor at the University of Michigan School of Social Work, emphasises: “Spanking thus does the opposite of what parents usually want it to do.”

Gershoff and Grogan-Kaylor tested for some long-term effects among adults who were spanked as children. The more they were spanked, the more likely they were to exhibit antisocial behaviour and to experience mental health problems. They were also more likely to support physical punishment for their own children, which highlights one of the key ways that attitudes towards physical punishment are passed from generation to generation.

Both spanking and physical abuse were associated with the same detrimental child outcomes in the same direction and nearly the same strength.