
I felt so virtuous while munching on some quinoa chips that I'd picked up at a recent health food and sustainable living expo. Then I turned the bag around, and found out what was in there.
One 28-gram serving, or about 32 chips, contained 150 calories, eight grams of fat, 19 grams of carbs (of which one gram is dietary fibre) and two grams of protein.
That isn't too far off the nutritional value of regular potato chips. A same-sized serving of Lay's Classic potato chips has 160 calories, 10 grams of fat, 15 grams of carbs (of which one gram is dietary fibre) and two grams of protein.

My munching stopped. Isn't quinoa the grain that's earned "superfood" status and been praised by scores of devotees for its high nutritional value? Wasn't it described as the "golden grain of the Andes" because it was packed with protein, dietary fibre, vitamins and minerals?
At the very least, shouldn't it be more nutritious than a regular potato?
Yes, yes and yes. That's all true, but it's not necessarily the case when quinoa has been reincarnated as chips and, increasingly, other everyday snacks and staples.