The other day, I got into a discussion with a friend about the restaurants I review for 48 Hours, the magazine published on Thursdays with the South China Morning Post. He commented that I reviewed too many Japanese restaurants. So I checked the list of places I had visited over the past few months and found I had eaten at 11 Chinese restaurants, 10 Japanese and 21 serving "other cuisines" - which I see as pretty even-handed. Wanting to play devil's advocate, he checked the Open Rice website to find out how many different cuisines were represented in Hong Kong and wondered if what I review shouldn't reflect that same extensive range.

I showed my friend the different types of restaurants that make it onto the list and explained that if my reviews lean heavily towards Chinese and Japanese cuisines, that's because a preponderance of those types open. And while I do try to write about a broad range of cuisines, if, say, an Indian restaurant opens in an out-of-the-way area, replacing another Indian eatery, I'm probably not going to review it unless someone I trust tells me that the food is unusually good.
When I review a bad restaurant, it's by accident, and I try to cut my losses before that happens.