Advertisement
Advertisement
The Philippines
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
A supporter holds pictures of the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos and his wife Imelda Marcos at a Philippine presidential election campaign rally in Metro Manila. Photo: Getty Images

‘The big lie of the Marcoses …’ For Filipino novelist Miguel Syjuco, reality is uncomfortably close to his satire about a Philippines presidential election

  • Novelist’s second book, I Was the President’s Mistress!! sends up a scandal-plagued government and a succession of corrupt Philippines statesmen in bawdy style
  • His satire is not without hope but he fears it comes too late to dissuade Filipinos from voting into power ‘inept’, ‘big-mouth liar’ Ferdinand Marcos Jnr

I Was the President’s Mistress!! by Miguel Syjuco, pub. Farrar, Straus and Giroux

“We’ve had the erosion of democratic checks and balances, of freedom of the press … deported foreigners critical of [the] administration, jailed opposition candidates. All of that.”

Sound familiar? “So, six years later, we are ever more susceptible to disinformation and more disempowered than ever,” continues Filipino novelist Miguel Syjuco in a searing assessment of his homeland under outgoing president Rodrigo Duterte.

“The Duterte campaign slogan was ‘change is coming’. Well, yes: people are less free, much more violent, we’re a poor country with a weaker economy and are consistently ranked last in the Covid resilience ratings. We’re a shambles; that’s the change that has come.”

Writer Miguel Syjuco. Photo: courtesy of Miguel Syjuco

The Philippines is the setting for Syjuco’s second novel, I Was the President’s Mistress!! Coming 14 years after its first draft and Syjuco’s Man Asian Literary Prize-winning debut, Ilustrado (honoured at a ritzy shindig at Hong Kong’s Peninsula hotel), on its most accessible level it is a bawdy gambol through the salacious recollections of Vita Nova – “singer, dancer, movie star, philanthropist, former paramour to the most powerful man in the realm”.

Fundamentally, however, it is a caustic exposé of the state of the nation as also revealed by Vita’s friends and enemies, including the president, a bishop, a DJ, a journalist, an ex-sailor, an opposition politician and a failed assassin.

Marcos’ message is essentially ‘make the Philippines great again’, but he’s so feckless and inept that he doesn’t show up for debates
Miguel Syjuco
As the satire charges towards its climax a day of reckoning beckons in the form of a presidential election, just as the Philippines approaches its own, real, moment of truth on May 9 – for which Syjuco has low hopes.

A professor of literature at New York University Abu Dhabi, from where he is speaking, Syjuco, 45, has no regrets about not following his parents into politics, even as he contemplates the increasingly bleak future into which he fears the Philippines is plunging.

Leading the race to the Malacañang Palace is Ferdinand Marcos Jnr, son of the ex-dictator and kleptocrat exiled in 1986 and who, says Syjuco, has taken on Duterte’s “mantle of the strongman, big-mouth liar”. But if Syjuco is fizzing with rage internally at the disgraced family’s political fightback, he is maintaining his usual equanimity in conversation.

“Marcos’ message is essentially ‘make the Philippines great again’,” he says, “but he’s so feckless and inept that he doesn’t show up for debates, he doesn’t stand before real journalists.

“He’ll get interviews with sympathetic or lifestyle journalists, with their softball questions, and when it comes to real scrutiny he’s absent – all the other candidates show up.

“He has been dismayingly popular in the polls – and not all of them can be cooked. We’re a country that praises celebrity and increasingly infamy, that’s the sad thing.

A boy holds a placard at a protest in Manila in 2017. President Rodrigo Duterte, Syjuco says, has made the Philippine people less free and much more violent. Photo: Jes Aznar/Getty Images
“The big lie of the Marcoses being trotted out to fool this younger generation of Filipinos raised on social media, who get their news online, is that they are innocent victims of the oligarchs and elite who ousted their capable and successful father, who was forced to declare martial law because of communism; and that our route to becoming the next Singapore was hijacked by the Aquinos, the Church, and the rich and educated.

“The lie is that the allegations – the convictions, actually – all the embezzlement, all the sins of the Marcoses, are being cast by the Marcoses as lies. They are using their lies to try to cast the truth as a lie.”

I Was the President’s Mistress!! turns up the heat, Syjuco unleashing it to sizzle with lurid sex, Rabelaisian jokes and bacchanalia; douse in vitriol a scandal-lashed government; tear down racists and misogynists; serve as an ironic equal-opportunity goader of assorted belief systems; and scathingly lampoon history’s parade of corrupt Filipino statesmen responsible for “bulldozing limits to presidential authority”, as one character puts it.

All this is wrapped in a blizzard of pop culture and occasional sporting references – Billy Joel, the Green Bay Packers, Edward Hopper, Metallica, AC/DC, John Mellencamp, Fenway Park, Bonnie Tyler, Frank Zappa – that itself comes, at times, in a torrent of “modern-day” language (and titular punctuation) shaped by social media.

It is a work, says Syjuco, coloured by “the way we speak now” and one illuminated by ready-made aphorisms (“corruption thrives when temptation meets tolerance”; “the world can’t stand a free woman”; “politics is showbiz for ugly people”; “chaos offers everyone opportunity”). Even allowing for a century of literary evolution, comparisons with Ulysses are inevitable.

The cover of Syjuco’s book.

If there is any hope for “new life” for the fictional Philippines, it is embodied by the 30-something Vita Nova herself: despite being another flawed character, Syjuco says she “comes in with community support, good ideas and a heart in the right place – which should be enough for anyone in a democracy to have access to power”.

He does, however, caution against putting real faces to the names of his creations: “they are everybody and nobody, my characters are based on archetypes, not people”, he says.

Not that he can be accused of being merely a distant observer of events in his homeland, about which he writes for The New York Times. “I go in under the radar,” he reveals, which allows him to report from crime scenes and within communities where there is “fear and dismay”.

And although he realises the book will appear too late (“we novelists work at a glacial pace”) to affect this year’s vote, Syjuco says, “If I can change just one person’s mind, that’s what it’s about, engaging readers one at a time.

“People will see what’s in the book, what’s happening in the elections, in the campaigns, on the streets. Things will resonate and maybe have some influence in the long term. The book is about our relationship with truth. Whom and what do we believe?”

And because it encapsulates a zeitgeist reaching far beyond the Philippines, it is also a novel “designed to play with offensiveness, to examine and maybe push the boundaries of free speech”.

“Why do we have to be afraid of offending people?” asks Syjuco. “Why do we have to make everybody happy?”

Post