Home from Home | Historic buildings at every turn in England. Not so in Hong Kong, so let’s treasure the ones we still have
- Britons are spoiled for choice when it comes to historic houses, churches and monuments. That sense of history is lacking in Hong Kong
- Few historic buildings in the city have been preserved – the Tai Kwun complex is an exception. Hong Kong should not let those that remain be demolished

Hong Kong is justifiably proud of its stunning cityscape, with skyscrapers creating a futuristic panorama. But the flip side is the lack of historic buildings. Most have been bulldozed in the name of progress or, more likely, profit.
That sense of history was something I missed during my 28 years in Hong Kong. Now, back in Britain, I don’t have to go far to find it.
The church in my village received its first rector in 1243. The manor house down the road has been there since the 15th century and the pub on the village green was built in 1608. Great care is taken to ensure the traditional character of the village is preserved.
But the historical gems are to be found when visiting National Trust properties. This conservation charity owns more than 500 historic houses, castles and gardens. An annual membership costs £84 (US$106). This gives you unlimited access to all of them.

Scotney Castle, in Kent, a favourite of mine, features a ruined medieval fortress and a moat in expansive grounds. There is an impressive country house, built in 1837, with beautiful views.
Bateman’s, in Sussex, was the home of The Jungle Book author Rudyard Kipling, who moved there in 1902. It is still much as it was during his time, with a recreated study, complete with screwed up drafts overflowing from the bin.
