Advertisement
Advertisement
Dragon versus wagon: a photo of a Komodo dragon that went viral on social media. Photo: Twitter / @KawanBaikKomodo
Opinion
Destinations known
by Mercedes Hutton
Destinations known
by Mercedes Hutton

Ten new Balis? That’s the last thing Indonesia needs

  • Plans to recreate the holiday idyll in other parts of the country ignores the devastation caused by an over-dependence on tourism
  • In Komodo National Park, construction of a Jurassic Park-style theme park worries conservationists
An image of a Komodo dragon facing down a construction truck – the environmental equivalent of Tank Man – in Indonesia’s Komodo National Park has gone viral. It was shared on social media on October 23 by Save Komodo Now, a collective of activist organisations that, according to its Twitter bio, is committed to protecting and preserving Komodo National Park.
What the park and its inhabitants – reptile and human – need protection from is the government’s plan to transform Labuan Bajo, a fishing town on the island of Flores that serves as the entry point for tourists wanting to witness the world’s largest living lizards, and the surrounding area into one of 10 “new Balis”.

The plan involves pouring a not inconsiderable amount of concrete on Rinca, one of only five islands where the dragons live, to create a Jurassic Park-inspired theme park. (Incidentally, anyone who has visited will know that the scenery itself does a pretty convincing Jurassic Park impression – no concrete necessary.)

A video – also shared by Save Komodo Now but purportedly from the architects tasked with conceiving said attraction – that shows renderings of how the circular structure will appear is set to music that sounds remarkably like the theme to the original, 1993 Jurassic Park film. In September, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation reported that the Rinca Island development, scheduled for completion in June 2021, would cost 69 billion rupiah (US$4.7 million) and feature a 1.3 hectare geopark and a 4,000 square metre information centre.

After much ado last year about potenti­ally closing the park or charging US$1,000 per visit– both advertised as conservation efforts – construction work on Rinca began quietly, at least in terms of press coverage. We imagine the comings and goings of trucks, excavators and at least one helicop­ter would have made for a rather noisy (read: stressful) existence for residents.

“Environmentalists opposed to the national park development have protested three times since February, but are yet to receive a response from the government,” reported the ABC. Shana Fatina, the presi­dent director of the Labuan Bajo Flores Tourism Authority, told the broadcaster that an environmental impact assessment had been completed and the development was progressing in accordance with regulations and would not interrupt conservation efforts.

But what about the other nine desti­nations earmarked as new Balis – without charismatic megafauna to call their own, does anyone even care if construction threatens local communities and environments? And, given the possibility of economic and ecological collapse in Bali, issues that have been highlighted by the coronavirus, is it even right to be engineering places in its image?

In September, President Joko Widodo said that Bali had taken the biggest economic hit inflicted by the pandemic in Indonesia. “This is because tourists, and tourism, [are] so dominant for Bali’s economy and so we can see how it [resulted] in this sharp decline,” he said.

Businesses have closed and livelihoods have been lost. The head of the island’s tourism board has said it needs inter­national visitors to return because “agri­culture alone could not get Bali’s economy back to normal”. Surely, there could be no starker warning against replicating Bali on a national scale?

Perhaps the ruinous impact of millions of visitors on Bali’s environment is equally ominous. Before the pandemic, Bali’s beaches often went viral for having more plastic than sand on them, and fresh water was becoming increasingly scarce, sucked up by developments and hotels catering to all those visitors. Beyond carefully mani­cured resort areas and villas, construction dominates the once unspoilt landscape.

It’s not a pretty sight, literally or figura­tively, and unless serious consideration is given to developing Komodo National Park and those other new Balis responsibly and by working with indigenous commu­nities, Indonesia could end up with 11 unsustain­able tourist destinations/building sites.

Qantas launches ‘flights to somewhere’

Uluru seen from a commercial flight. Photo: EPA
We’ve now all heard of “flights to nowhere” – round trips that return to the point of departure, perhaps flying over a pictur­esque part of whichever country its passengers are confined to, without a thought for the environment. Now, Qantas is upping the ante with “flights to somewhere”.

Yes, with some state borders now open, Australians have the opportunity to visit other parts of their country. Normally, we’d call that domestic tourism, but shhhh … don’t be a spoilsport.

According to website Traveller, “Rather than simply flying over destinations and returning to its point of departure, the next scenic flights will involve landing at a desti­nation for an overnight stay.” Imagine that!

Qantas’ first “flight to somewhere” – to Uluru from Sydney – sold out in 10 minutes. The airline promises the flight will be 100 per cent carbon offset, reports Traveller.

Singapore lifts restrictions for visitors from mainland China and Victoria, Australia

Singapore is slowly opening up. Photo: EPA

Australians living in the state of Victoria, however, should soon be able to go some­where else. On October 29, Bloomberg reported that Singapore would be lifting border restrictions for travellers from Victoria and mainland China from November 6. Visitors will have to take a polymerase chain reaction test upon arrival at Changi airport and, as long as the result is negative, they’ll be able to enter the Lion City without having to self isolate.

Singapore’s aviation authority said that both China and Victoria “have comprehen­sive public health surveillance systems and displayed successful control over the spread of the Covid-19 virus”. Meanwhile, we in Hong Kong are still waiting for that travel bubble to materialise …
Post