bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

paywallTypes

createdDate

publishedDate

sponsorType

urlAlias

moreOnThisArticles

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

articleSpeeches

socialHeadline

headline

images

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

sponsor

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Threatening lawsuits and protests, opponents are gearing up to fight a decision by Okinawa’s governor that could pave the way for a new US military base on the southern Japanese island.
US Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel welcomed Friday’s decision, calling it “the most significant milestone” so far in a long-running battle to realign US forces in Okinawa, but the reaction was hostile in Japan.
The new base is designed to reduce the impact of the heavy US military presence in Okinawa by replacing another base in a more congested area, but opponents want the operations moved off Okinawa completely.
“What the governor has done is unforgivable,” Yuichi Higa, the head of the assembly in Nago city, said in a phone interview. Nago would house the new base.
“Residents who are opposed will surely resort to the use of force, such as blocking roads, to stop this from happening,” Higa said.
Hiroshi Ashitomi, head of a Nago group opposing the base, said his organisation would file a lawsuit challenging the governor’s decision.

	“Residents who are opposed will surely resort to the use of force, such as blocking roads, to stop this from happening.”

	Yuichi Higa
Governor Hirokazu Nakaima on Friday approved the Japanese Defence Ministry’s application to reclaim land for the proposed American base on Okinawa’s coast. It would replace the US Marine Corps Futenma base in Ginowan city.
But he later told a news conference that he would continue pressing to move the Futenma troops off Okinawa entirely, noting estimates that it would take nine and a half years to build the base.
“My thinking remains it would be fastest to relocate outside [Okinawa] prefecture to a place where there is already an airport,” he said.
The new base is part of a US-Japan agreement that would also move 9,000 Marines off Okinawa, including transferring 5,000 to Guam.
Hagel said the effort to realign American troops in Okinawa was “absolutely critical to the United States’ ongoing rebalance” toward the Asia-Pacific region.
“Moving forward with this plan will reduce our footprint in the most populated part of Okinawa ... while sustaining US military capabilities vital to the peace and security of the region,” the defence secretary said in a statement.
The debate over the future of Futenma dates to 1996, when the US and Japan signed an agreement to close the base and move its operations elsewhere in Okinawa. In 2006, the two countries agreed to relocate the base to a relatively unpopulated area called Henoko in Nago city. But after the Democratic Party of Japan took power in 2009, it raised the possibility that the base could be moved off of Okinawa. While it later agreed to the Henoko plan, the proposal energised a movement to move the base elsewhere.
About half of the 50,000 American troops in Japan are based in Okinawa, and many residents complain about base-related crime, noise and the risk of accidents. Some feel the island is bearing an unfair share of the burden of protecting Japan from attack.
A key factor could be the outcome of a mayoral election in Nago next month, which pits an opponent of the Henoko plan against a supporter.

“The governor is taking a risk putting the prestige of his office behind the project,” said Jun Okumura, a political analyst and former national government official. “I still don’t see the project going forward without the consent of the Nago mayor, but I see that this improves the chances of success.”
The rise of China’s military is reinforcing in the minds of some Japanese the need to have a strong defence, though it’s unclear whether it’s enough to sway public opinion in Okinawa.
“The government of Japan is poised to take whatever measures are necessary to maintain a strong deterrent while reducing the burden on the people of Okinawa,” said the government’s top spokesman, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga.
Suga expressed his gratitude to Nakaima for what he called a “bold step”.
The politically difficult decision came only after Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe met with Nakaima in Tokyo on Wednesday and offered him a package that included pledges of increased financial assistance for Okinawa.
 


Opponents vow to fight new US military base on Okinawa

Henoko in Nago city, site of the new US military base in Okinawa. Photo: AP

Protesters hold banners reading 'We won't budge!' outside the Okinawa prefecture building on Friday. Photo: EPA 

Japan ex-minister warns of Okinawa unrest, secession

Anti American protesters in Okinawa at a recent rally. Photo: AP

Japan and US agree Okinawa deal

Hercules aircraft on the tarmac at Futenma base. Photo: Reuters

News

Asia

Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel has welcomed Japan's decision to move the US military base in Okinawa, but locals have voiced opposition


Opponents vow to fight new US military base on Okinawa

.css-1c6uqr6{color:inherit;font-weight:inherit;font-size:inherit;font-family:inherit;line-height:inherit;overflow-wrap:break-word;}Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel has welcomed Japan's decision to move the US military base in Okinawa, but locals have voiced opposition

Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel has welcomed Japan's decision to move the US military base in Okinawa, but locals have voiced opposition