Advertisement
Advertisement
Australia
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
The Melbourne barrister had been giving information to Victoria Police from 2005 to 2009. Photo: EPA

Hundreds of gangland convictions in Australia could be overturned after mob lawyer named as police informant

  • Court documents show that a top Melbourne barrister had been giving information to Victoria Police for years
  • The unnamed lawyer’s clients included a crime boss and his associates
Australia

Hundreds of criminal convictions – including those meted out to some of Australia’s most notorious gangland figures – hang in the balance, after their defence lawyer was revealed as a police informant on Monday.

Court documents disclosed that a high-profile Melbourne barrister had for years been giving information to Victoria Police, while representing clients like crime boss Tony Mokbel and six of his associates.

The revelation came after court injunctions were lifted on Monday, blowing the lid off one of the biggest legal scandals to hit the country in years and prompting the authorities to immediately announce a public inquiry.

In a secret court battle spanning more than two years, police had tried to stop state prosecutors from telling the seven people about their barrister’s supergrass role. They were finally knocked back by Australia’s highest court last month.

A 2008 file photo of Australian crime boss Tony Mokbel. Photo: Reuters

The High Court blasted police as being “guilty of reprehensible conduct” and said they were “involved in sanctioning atrocious breaches of the sworn duty of every police officer”.

“The prosecution of each convicted person was corrupted in a manner which debased fundamental premises of the criminal justice system,” the High Court added in a scathing judgment.

The lawyer – given the code name 3838 by police when she was working as an informant between 2005-2009 – kept in daily contact with her handlers, who passed on information provided by her to various police task forces, court documents stated.

Australia named as one of the world’s worst performers on biodiversity, says WWF

While the courts only mentioned Mokbel and his associates, more than 600 cases could be tainted, according to Melbourne’s Herald Sun.

Mokbel was jailed in 2012 for a minimum of 22 years for masterminding a drug trafficking empire.

The High Court decision means criminals would be notified that their barrister, who still cannot be named, was a police informant, thus possibly affecting their cases.

It would mean these criminals could then appeal their convictions.

Victoria Premier Daniel Andrews, left, and Chief Commissioner Graham Ashton. Photo: EPA

Victoria’s Director of Public Prosecutions Kerri Judd said she had written to 20 individuals about their cases, and was assessing others.

“If appropriate, I will also write to those affected individuals,” she said in a statement.

Victoria Premier Daniel Andrews meanwhile announced a royal commission into the scandal, saying the public had a “right to know that every part of the justice system acts fairly and lawfully at all times”.

From Afghanistan to the Outback: why refugees are ditching Australia’s pricey cities and going bush

Victoria Police Chief Commissioner Graham Ashton said the force changed how it managed informants in 2009, so such incidents cannot be repeated today.

Ashton said while police would cooperate with the probe, what was happening in the underworld at that time should be taken into account.

“Melbourne was in the grip of what is now rightly known as the gangland wars,” he told reporters. “The risk to the community at this time was significant.”

Legal advocacy group The Human Rights Law Centre said an independent investigative body should also be established to probe all allegations of police misconduct. “This case touches the highest levels of Victoria Police. While this is an extreme case it’s not an isolated example of police misconduct,” said the centre’s Ruth Barson in a statement.

This article appeared in the South China Morning Post print edition as: Cases in doubt after lawyer revealed as informant
Post