What North Korea’s Kim Jong-un meant with his New Year warning of a ‘new path’
- The young leader called for a ‘complete end’ to all joint US-South Korea military exercises and slammed the sanctions, but experts say he realistically cannot jeopardise the thaw with Washington
In his New Year address on Tuesday, North Korean leader Kim Jong-un warned he might take a “new path” if Washington maintains sanctions amid his country’s push for economic development, but experts say it may be too late to change the trajectory of negotiations.
Kim did not specify what the new approach might be. His warning may sound similar to the bellicose rhetoric that Pyongyang often deployed before last year’s summit, but he cannot jeopardise the thaw and has few options beyond appealing directly to US President Donald Trump, experts say.
Is this a sign of frustration?
Kim vowed to work towards denuclearisation at a summit with Trump in Singapore in June. But since then there has been little progress, with a high-level meeting between the two sides cancelled abruptly in November.
Pyongyang has demanded Washington lift sanctions and declare an end to the 1950-53 Korean war in response to the dismantlement of its Punggye-ri nuclear testing site and a missile engine facility.
Despite goodwill responses from Washington, such as a halt of some military exercises with South Korea, US officials have said North Korea’s initial steps were not confirmed and could be reversed.
US Vice-President Mike Pence said North Korea would not be forced to provide a list of nuclear weapons and locations, and a US nuclear envoy offered to facilitate humanitarian aid.
But Kim’s on Tuesday called for a “complete end” to all joint exercises and slammed the sanctions.
“His message was ‘we have done what we said we would at Singapore, but the United States has done very little in return,’” said Vipin Narang, a political scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
What does “new path” mean?
North Korea’s state media has stepped up criticism of the US, warning of a return to the era of confrontation if sanctions and pressure continued. But that indicates Pyongyang’s frustration rather than the “new path” Kim suggested, experts say.
“One thing is clear: Kim is not going to return to any sort of posture where the US or its allies would consider a military attack, and that means no missile or nuclear tests for the foreseeable future,” said Harry Kazianis of the Washington-based Centre for the National Interest.
Instead, “new path” may refer to focusing on concessions that don’t involve broad denuclearisation in favour of action-for-action commitments.
South Korea’s Unification Ministry did not speculate on what the alternative path might be, but said Kim showed “clear resolve” to abandon the weapons programme and improve US ties by mentioning “complete denuclearisation” himself for the first time.
Kim Joon-hyung, a professor at Handong Global University, said one possible scenario was the North’s dismantling of the Yongbyon nuclear complex, as offered at an inter-Korean summit in September in Pyongyang, and acknowledging some facilities in return for eased sanctions.
Kim Jong-un said in the speech he was willing to reopen the Kaesong factory park and allow access to the North’s Mount Kumgang resort “without conditions”.
Yet there remains an opportunity to limit Kim’s arsenal, said Patrick Cronin of the Hudson Institute in Washington.
“This will not be easy, and neither side will achieve outright success, but diplomacy is possible,” Cronin said. “China and others may also be invited to play a role.”
Does North Korea want to shift focus from the US?
Kim’s address called for a launch of multilateral talks to officially declare an end to the Korean war, an idea also floated previously by South Korea.
That could mean working with China, South Korea and others in pressing Washington, professor Kim said. But other experts, including former South Korean nuclear envoy Lee Soo-hyuk, were sceptical that would happen given the deadlocked bilateral talks, the Sino-U. S. trade war and Trump’s dislike for multinational mechanisms.
“Kim can present Trump with a choice: Either play ball with me on a negotiated nuclear settlement and reduce sanctions or I will go to China for help and get the economic development I want and keep my nukes,” Kazianis said.