Advertisement
Advertisement
Japan
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
Three Britons are being held over a robbery that took place in Tokyo. Photo: EPA-EFE

Japan detains three British men over jewellery store robbery in Tokyo in 2015

  • The men punched a security guard and broke display cases at Harry Winston’s shop in the Omotesando Hills complex in Shibuya Ward on November 20, 2015
  • The suspects left Japan two days after the crime – a UK court is to decide whether they should return as there is no extradition treaty with Tokyo
Japan

Three men have been detained in Britain over their alleged involvement in a 2015 robbery that netted over 100 million yen (US$742,000) worth of jewellery from a luxury shop in central Tokyo, an investigative source said Saturday.

The source said whether the three will be transferred to Japan is being determined by a court in Britain, which does not have an extradition treaty with Tokyo.

The three Britons left Japan two days after the heist and were put on an international wanted list by Japanese police through the International Criminal Police Organisation, or Interpol.

The men are suspected of taking 46 pieces of jewellery worth 106 million yen (US$787,000), including rings and pendants, after punching a male security guard and breaking display cases at Harry Winston’s shop in the Omotesando Hills commercial complex in Shibuya Ward on the night of November 20, 2015.

HK$22 million gone in 5 minutes: robbers hold up Hong Kong jewellery store

The three are Daniel Kelly, 44, Joe Chappell, 36, and a man aged 19 at the time of the robbery who is now 26, according to the source.

Japanese police identified the men through security camera footage. Japan currently only has extradition treaties with the United States and South Korea.

In the absence of an extradition treaty, the country where a crime was committed usually asks a suspect’s home country to prosecute. Under the British judicial system, an offence is usually tried in the jurisdiction in which it took place.

The men’s defence has been arguing that a handover could raise human rights concerns, according to the source.

4