Advertisement
Advertisement
India
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
A mountain road near the Nathula Pass, an open trading post in the Himalayas between India and China, in Sikkim, India. Photo: Bloomberg

Sikkim, a tiny state in India, wants to pay its 610,500 citizens a universal basic income

  • If successful, the experiment by Sikkim, one of India’s most progressive states, would help alleviate poverty and address the challenge of job automation
  • Detractors of universal basic income say it is an expensive concept that disincentivises work
India

High in the Himalayas, Sikkim is one of the tiniest states in India. But it is about to embark on a big experiment of global interest.

Sikkim’s ruling party has announced an ambitious plan to institute a universal basic income for every one of its 610,577 citizens.

If successful, the scheme would represent the largest trial run anywhere in the world of a concept that supporters like Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg say could provide a safety net, help alleviate poverty and address the challenge of job automation. Detractors say it would reduce the incentive to work and would come at a huge expense.

A universal basic income (UBI) is a regular, guaranteed income paid by the government, universally and unconditionally, to all citizens. It is a cash payment that aims to replace the often-confusing array of assistance states offer to citizens and places spending decisions in the hands of the recipients.

“If there is one chance of it happening anywhere, it is Sikkim,” said PD Rai, the sole member of India’s parliament from the state.

Workers pluck leaves at an organic tea garden in India’s Himalayan state of Sikkim. Photo: Reuters

Sikkim already has a progressive track record: it was one of the first Indian states to ban plastic bags back in 1998 – a ban that it has managed to implement successfully, unlike many other states. It has also provided housing for all its citizens. Most recently, it became the country’s first organic state, eliminating the use of pesticides and fertilisers.

Sikkim’s social indexes also stand out from the rest of the country, with a literacy rate of 98 per cent. It has managed to bring the percentage of people living below the poverty line to just about 8 per cent – compared with nearly 30 per cent nationally. Sikkim’s small geographic area and low population density have been responsible, in part, for its success.

Rai acknowledges that a UBI programme will come with challenges.

Getting paid to do nothing: Why the idea of China’s dibao is catching on

“It’s a matter of political will, ultimately,” he said. “With the rise of global inequality, we want to ensure that we bridge the gap.”

Rai declined to disclose how much the programme, which was announced ahead of elections this spring, would potentially cost the state.

The tourism and power sectors will be tapped to raise the resources. With more than 2.5 million travelers visiting annually, tourism is a major source of revenue. Being a surplus power generating state, Sikkim sells 90 per cent of its hydropower.

A tourist (right) making a purchase at Tsongmo Lake near the Nathula Pass, in Sikkim, India. Photo: Bloomberg

For now, said Rai, the government is meeting with experts and stakeholders and expects to roll out the scheme by 2022.

India has a large existing social security apparatus: the central government alone spends 5 per cent of GDP on 950 social programmes. These range from free rice, an allowance to build houses and even guaranteed employment for some living in rural areas.

But inefficient implementation and diversion of funds due to corruption have long plagued the system, leading many to propose a universal basic income as a possible solution. India’s Economic Survey for 2017 highlighted the concept as a “powerful idea” that should be debated.

Universal basic income: a grand welfare plan or a charter for shirkers?

Elsewhere in the world, there have been several small-scale experiments with UBI programmes, but they have met with limited success. In April 2017, the government of Ontario in Canada announced a pilot project involving 4,000 people that would have cost C$150 million (US$113 million). The project ended abruptly after a year when the local government changed and called it “expensive and unsustainable”.

In Finland, an experiment with universal basic income similarly ended last year before its completion. The trial included a US$630 monthly payment to 2,000 unemployed citizens.

In the United States, the concept has been floated in the California city of Stockton by its young mayor. Last year, it announced that 100 residents would receive US$500 a month for 18 months.

The notion of a universal basic income has found backers in Silicon Valley, with tech moguls like Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk endorsing it.

Elon Musk is a proponent of a universal basic income. Photo: Bloomberg

In his Harvard commencement address in 2017, Zuckerberg spoke of the need for a “new social contract”, with ideas like a basic income to provide a “cushion” for everyone. Musk has described UBI as a “necessary” step as automation takes over human jobs.

But economists have pointed to various possible pitfalls.

Some question whether giving cash instead of something like a food subsidy would lead to spending on wasteful items. Aloso, as prices rise, a cash handout would buy fewer goods.

Others say a basic income would disincentivise work, raising the possibility of a shrinking labour force.

Guaranteed income for everyone a big idea deserving of careful debate

Hailing Sikkim’s initiative, Pranab Bardhan, an economist at the University of California, Berkeley, said the rationale behind a universal basic income in a place like Sikkim is very different from a place like Stockton.

“In developed countries, the main purpose is to restructure or economise the existing welfare schemes, like unemployment benefits,” Bardhan said. “In low- or mid-income countries, like India, the rationale will be to address the minimum economic insecurity of a larger section of the population, not just the poorest, without touching the existing anti-poverty measures.”

Post