“The US president made certain remarks to the effect he was ready to mediate if requested by India and Pakistan. I categorically assure the house that no such request has been made by the prime minister. I repeat, no such request was made,” he told parliament.

Raveesh Kumar, India’s foreign ministry spokesman, said: “It has been India’s consistent position that all outstanding issues with Pakistan are discussed only bilaterally. Any engagement with Pakistan would require an end to cross-border terrorism.”

India and Pakistan divided Muslim-majority Kashmir after their independence in 1947, but both claim the region in its entirety. An insurgency on the Indian side over the past three decades has left more than 70,000 dead, mainly civilians.

In February, a suicide bombing claimed by a Pakistan-based militant group killed 41 Indian troops in Indian-controlled Kashmir, prompting tit-for-tat air strikes between the two countries.

Some 70,000 people, mostly civilians, have died over the past 30 years in Indian-administered Kashmir, monitoring groups say. The fighting is between Indian soldiers – who number around 500,000 on the ground – and rebels wanting either independence or union with Pakistan.

“I honestly don’t think Trump has the slightest idea of what he’s talking about,” said Shashi Tharoor, a senior politician from India’s main opposition Congress party, on Twitter. “He has either not been briefed or not understood what Modi was saying or what India’s position is on 3rd-party mediation.”

Soon after Trump’s remarks, the US State Department said in a post on Twitter that it supported any dialogue between India and Pakistan, but that Kashmir was a matter for the two countries.

“While Kashmir is a bilateral issue for both parties to discuss, the Trump administration welcomes Pakistan and India sitting down and the United States stands ready to assist,” it said.

The Democratic chairman of the US House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee, Eliot Engel, spoke to the Indian ambassador to say there was no change in the US position on Kashmir, the committee said on Twitter.

China takes credit for helping de-escalate India-Pakistan tensions

“Engel reiterated his support for the longstanding US position on the Kashmir dispute, saying he supported dialogue between India & Pakistan, but the dialogue’s pace & scope can only be determined by India & Pakistan.”

He also said that Pakistan must “dismantle the terrorist infrastructure” for any meaningful dialogue with India.

Pakistan’s Khan and Kashmiri separatists welcomed US intervention.

“I can tell you right now Mr President you will have the prayers of over a billion people if you can mediate and resolve this issue,” Khan said.

Kashmir separatist leader Mirwaiz Umar Farooq said he would support any effort to end the conflict in the region in which tens of thousands have been killed, and the people of Kashmir would welcome Trump’s intervention.

Kashmir conflict explained: what took Pakistan and India to brink of war?

It was by no means the first time Trump has offered to intervene in a seemingly intractable international dispute.

Afghanistan is high on Trump’s agenda as his testy relationship with Khan may be improving. Trump suggested Pakistan could use its influence with the Taliban to help the US “extricate” from Afghanistan.

Pakistan, which is suffering economically, wants to reset relations with the US in hopes of securing more investment, trade and possibly a restoration of American aid that Trump cut.

Trump and Khan – a former sports star – are both unpredictable and their relationship has been rocky. Monday’s visit was meant to resolve tensions and address complex problems facing both nations.

In recent years, relations between the US and Pakistan have resembled a yo-yo. They reached rock bottom under former President Barack Obama when the US carried out the raid on al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden’s compound in Pakistan without giving Islamabad a heads-up. The relationship did not improve when Trump took office.

Will Modi’s new government bring peace for India and Pakistan?

In November 2018, Trump tweeted: “We no longer pay Pakistan the $Billions because they would take our money and do nothing for us, Bin Laden being a prime example, Afghanistan being another.”

That statement created a furore in Islamabad.

Khan, the former captain of the Pakistani cricket team who assumed office last fall, fired back. He tweeted that Pakistan has suffered 75,000 casualties and lost US$123 billion in the “US War on Terror” despite the fact no Pakistanis were involved in the September 11 attacks. He said the US has only provided a “minuscule” US$20 billion in aid.

Now, both countries appear to be seeking to improve the relationship.

“We’ve made a lot of progress over the last couple of weeks, and Pakistan has helped us with that progress,” Trump said. “A lot of things are happening for the United States, and I think a lot of great things are going to be happening for Pakistan under your leadership.”

Trump took personal credit for the apparent revival of Pakistani cooperation, telling reporters: “I don’t think Pakistan respected the United States, I don’t think Pakistan respected its presidents.”

Khan, for his part, said: “I am one of those who always believed there was no military solution,” adding: “I have to compliment President Trump, because he has now forced people to end the war.”

Shamila Chaudhary, a senior fellow at the New America think tank and a former National Security Council official, said Khan’s visit amounted to “a reward for good behaviour for following through on the Taliban talks”.

“It will boost Imran Khan’s standing, both at home and internationally, [and] also opens up political space for him not to be seen as a pariah of the United States,” Chaudhary said.

However, Chaudhary also suggested the Trump-Khan encounter was in some ways a “formality” because it will be the meetings between the US and Pakistan’s powerful army chief, General Qamar Javed Bajwa, who also travelled to Washington, where the “real substance … will be discussed”.

Additional reporting by Associated Press

Connect with us on Twitter and Facebook