The short arm of the law: Cambodia’s Khmer Rouge tribunal says very few ‘will ever be prosecuted for atrocities’

Im Chaem, a former district chief accused of crimes against humanity, deemed not high-ranking enough for prosecution

PUBLISHED : Tuesday, 11 July, 2017, 3:46pm
UPDATED : Tuesday, 11 July, 2017, 3:54pm

The UN-backed Cambodian tribunal trying Khmer Rouge leaders for atrocities committed while they ruled the country has acknowledged that only a handful of former high-ranking officials will ever face justice for their crimes.

In a statement released on Monday, the tribunal sought to explain the dismissal in February of a case against Im Chaem, a middle-ranking Khmer Rouge district chief whom prosecutors had charged with crimes against humanity, including murder, extermination and enslavement.

‘I’m not a murderer’: top Khmer Rouge leader denies genocide at close of UN-backed trial

It is undoubtedly difficult for the public and the victims to accept that even the soldiers who routinely killed small children
Khmer Rouge tribunal statement

It said the court’s co-investigating judges had concluded that Im Chaem was not high-ranking enough to fall into the category of senior leaders. It added that she did not qualify for prosecution as a person “most responsible” for atrocities, because the evidence of specific crimes attributed to her did not meet acceptable legal standards.

It pointed out, however, that dismissal of the case against Im Chaem – now in her 70s – “does not equate to a statement that no crimes were committed by a charged person”.

As a district chief in the northwestern province of Banteay Meanchey, Im Chaem allegedly ran a forced labour camp to construct an irrigation project and was accused of being responsible for the deaths of possibly thousands of labourers.

The tribunal said that under the agreement that was negotiated to establish the tribunal, no other Cambodian courts have jurisdiction over human rights violations committed by members of the communist Khmer Rouge, whose harsh 1975-79 rule is generally considered responsible for the deaths of 1.7 million people from execution, overwork and neglect of medical care.

The absence of an alternative court to try such cases means “only a certain small group of people will ever be prosecuted in the courts of Cambodia for the atrocities” during Khmer Rouge rule, it said.

Cambodian court dismisses crimes against humanity case against mid-level Khmer Rouge cadre

“It is undoubtedly difficult for the public and the victims to accept that even the soldiers who routinely killed small children by bashing their heads against trees or who had competitions about who could kill the greatest number of people, should not face justice,” the statement said.

“In many domestic criminal justice systems such conduct would attract a whole life sentence without parole and in some countries possibly even the death penalty for each individual act of each individual offender.”

The agreement to limit such cases to the UN-assisted tribunal “was a conscious political choice during the negotiations, balancing the call for integration of the remaining Khmer Rouge into society against the desire for some form of judicial closure for the horrendous suffering of the victims,” the statement continued.

The tribunal has so far convicted two high-ranking Khmer Rouge leaders – Khieu Samphan, the 85-year-old Khmer Rouge head of state, and Nuon Chea, the 90-year-old right-hand man to the group’s late top leader, Pol Pot. A second trial of the two on separate charges was recently concluded and is awaiting a verdict.

Also convicted earlier was the head of its prison system, who ran a torture centre in Phnom Penh. Cases against a handful of other suspects are in the judicial pipeline.

Youk Chhang, head of the Documentation Centre of Cambodia, which has collected massive amounts of detailed evidence about the Khmer Rouge, said he was disappointed with the statement’s explanation.

Its redaction of the evidence against Im Chaem – based on the rule of presumption of innocence – means that the public at large is unable to judge the correctness of the decision to dismiss the case, he said.

He accused the co-investigating judges of “compromising justice”.

The tribunal’s statement said the evidence collected by the centre dealing with the charges against Im Chaem could not be taken into account because it was gathered in a manner not suitable for legal purposes.