Chinese Singaporeans more likely to worry about immigration: survey
- A survey by IPS examines how residents in the city state perceive the consequences if fault lines such as race, religion and immigration are mismanaged
- The study also found that millennials felt that mismanaging LGBT issues could result in polarisation in society
The study also found that Chinese respondents felt more likely than other groups in Singapore to experience an erosion in their national identity and loss of trust in the government if immigration issues were not managed properly.
Released on Tuesday by the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS), the working paper, called Fault lines in Singapore: Public Opinion on their Realities, Management and Consequences, examines five fault lines in Singapore and how residents here perceive the consequences if these fault lines are mismanaged.
Singapore’s ‘brownface’ saga sparks debate on race
Dr Mathew Mathews, an IPS senior research fellow who led the study, said that these fault lines were identified based on their mentions in public discussions such as in the media and in forums.
The study surveyed 4,015 Singaporean citizens and permanent residents from August last year to January this year.
How people view the fault lines
Younger respondents also perceived the consequences of mismanaging issues of race and religion to be “more ominous” compared to older respondents.
Almost three-fifths of those aged between 18 and 25 said that anger among and against communities would occur if race issues were mismanaged. Only two-fifths of older respondents aged above 65 felt the same way.
Those holding higher qualifications appeared to be more sensitised to the potential fallout of mismanaging race and religion.
More than three-fifths of degree holders said that mismanagement would result in anger against particular communities, while only two-fifths of respondents with Institute of Technical Education or lower qualifications said it would do so.
More years in school could have led those with better qualifications to internalise narratives on the importance of sustaining a multiracial harmonious society, the authors said.
Immigration and social-economic status
The survey respondents, particularly Chinese respondents, felt that mismanaging immigration could impact their national identity and trust in the government the most.
About 44 per cent of Chinese respondents said that if mismanaged, immigration could lead to a decrease in national identity. This was about 12 percentage points more than the proportion of minority respondents who felt the same way.
More affluent respondents also expected more severe consequences to social cohesion if the question of immigration was not managed properly.
How China’s 19th century crises shaped Chinese diaspora in Singapore
LGBT issues
About 50 per cent of those aged 18 to 25 felt that mismanaging LGBT issues could result in anger against particular communities as well as a polarisation in society. However, less than 40 per cent of older respondents aged above 65 felt the same.
More than half of those who held a bachelor’s degree and above felt that mismanaging LGBT issues would lead to a polarisation of views as well as anger in society. In comparison, only a third (or less than 35 per cent) of those with secondary school qualifications and below felt the same way.
Differing approaches to deal with fault lines
The study looked at two types of approaches to manage these fault lines, which could take the form of state intervention or public discussion such as dialogue sessions, and examined how people’s preferred approach varied across different backgrounds.
In general, respondents were most likely to feel that there is sufficient government involvement across the five fault lines – and fewer than half felt that more government involvement was necessary for all five fault lines.
Race and religion
When it came to race and religion, about two-thirds of the respondents said that there was enough state involvement in these issues, higher than that for the remaining three fault lines.
However, older respondents indicated that they wanted to see more state involvement in racial and religious issues.
33 per cent of those aged above 65 wanted more government involvement in mitigating issues of race compared to only 24 per cent of those aged between 18 and 25.
Most people surveyed said that there was enough discussion on race and religion in Singapore.
Just under 60 per cent of the respondents said so, compared to around 40 per cent of respondents who said that there should be more discussion on other issues such as social-economic status and immigration.
The authors said this suggested that race and religious issues had received “broad airing” and handled in “a fairly inclusive fashion” since Singapore’s independence.
However, minority respondents wanted more public dialogue on race and religion.
The survey also found that nearly half of the Malay and Indian respondents would actively investigate inflammatory texts or emails on race and religion, compared to 37 per cent of Chinese respondents.
About two-thirds of younger people were also more proactive in investigating the source of such material by checking with a friend to find out more, compared to only half of the respondents aged 65 and older.
In rich Singapore, why must migrant workers go hungry?
Immigration and social-economic status
The study found that higher-educated and younger respondents wanted the state to do more to mitigate immigration and class issues.
Half of those aged between 18 to 25 wanted more government involvement in class issues compared to 43 per cent of their older counterparts.
More than half of the respondents who were degree-holders wanted the state to manage class-related issues more, compared to 40 per cent of respondents with secondary school qualifications and below. This could be because higher-educated respondents may have more awareness of the consequences of mismanaging class-related issues.
For immigration issues, half of the degree-holders wanted more state intervention, while the figure was 45 per cent for those with secondary education and below.
LGBT issues
Millennials, especially those with liberal sexual values, were more likely to be in favour of both state involvement in and public discussion on LGBT issues.
Close to half of those aged between 18 and 25 want more government involvement in the issue, compared to 40 per cent of those aged above 65
Half of the younger respondents wanted more public discourse on the issue compared to 42 per cent of those aged above 65.
This could be due to millennials generally holding more liberal views, the authors said.
