In Thailand, cinema-goers’ refusal to stand for royal anthem reveals changing attitudes towards monarchy
- Just a few years ago, remaining seated during the royal anthem which plays before film screenings in Thailand would have been unthinkable
- But as the number of royalists in the country ‘dwindle by the day’, observers say more people are no longer afraid of being attacked for not standing
At a recent showing of the James Bond film No Time to Die at a central Bangkok cinema, nearly half of about 60 people sat down through the royal anthem without incident – a scene unthinkable just a few years ago, when film-goers risked being attacked if they did not stand. In 2019, a woman said she was assaulted for not standing up, while last year another man was splashed with a drink for sitting through the 90-second song in the eastern province of Chanthaburi.
“Things are changing,” said Chotisak Onsoong, a political activist who had popcorn and a water bottle thrown at him in 2007 when he sat for the anthem. He was later kicked out of the cinema and charged with insulting the royal family, although prosecutors eventually declined to pursue the case. He still refuses to stand and has noticed more people joining him in recent months.
“Protesting and not standing up for the anthem are really the same thing,” Chotisak said.
Thailand protests: it’s youths vs police at Bangkok’s Din Daeng neighbourhood
Royalist groups have noticed the trend as well. On October 29, a pro-monarchy Facebook group called “Good Students” posted a graphic of one person standing in a cinema before the start of the royal anthem with the caption: “Even if I’m the only one left standing, I’ll continue to stand up.”
Pheu Thai, the largest party in parliament and winner of the most seats in every Thai election since 2001, last week joined fellow pro-democracy organisation Move Forward in calling for changes to Thailand’s lese-majesty law, which mandates as many as 15 years in jail for insulting Vajiralongkorn and other top royals.
In a sign of the sensitivity, Pheu Thai later clarified that it would not spearhead the amendment, but would facilitate the discussions in parliament. Since mid-2020 at least 100 people have been charged under the law, with most cases stemming from online political comments and participation in the protests.
“This is an important issue for national security,” Prayuth told reporters in Bangkok on November 3, when asked about calls to change the lese-majesty law. “Please don’t destroy an institution that Thai people across the country respect. Some people may not understand it but hopefully one day they can learn more and understand it.”
Vajiralongkorn is now the largest shareholder of Siam Commercial Bank Pcl, Thailand’s most valuable lender. The bank announced a restructuring plan in September to create a new “mother ship company” called SCB X, seeking to triple its market capitalisation to 1 trillion baht (US$30 billion).
Thailand protests: pressure mounts on German government over king’s residence
Still, the king’s immense wealth has generated resentment among protesters, who want the assets transferred under the control of the Finance Ministry. Protesters have defaced the king’s portraits in public areas, prompting authorities to cover them up during demonstrations.
Other Thais have sought more creative ways to express discontent with the authorities. Some have worn crop tops similar to those worn by the king, women have protested topless and citizens have largely ignored government requests to wear the symbolic colour yellow on key royal holidays.
“Demonstrators are breaking with a political culture that demands conformity and demands non-confrontation,” said Tamara Loos, a professor of history and Thai studies at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, who has written several books on Thailand. “They want to expose the social norms that the hierarchy protects, and the king is at the top of that.”
While the government repealed a legal provision in 2010 that made it illegal to sit through the royal anthem, the practice was still considered socially unacceptable until recently. Chotisak noted that more people who are not very politically active are choosing to sit because they are no longer afraid of getting attacked by royalists.
“The number of royalists is dwindling by the day,” Chotisak said. “They can’t really convert the younger generation, or they pass away faster than new royalists can take their place. The proportions have changed. It’s different now than it was a decade ago.”