Hong Kong-based activists mostly silent after US Senator Ted Cruz blocks bill giving special refugee status to dissidents, citing spy threat from Beijing
- Cruz says China would exploit relaxed immigration standards to send spies to the US
- Under the bill, Hongkongers would be granted temporary protected status, joining citizens from 10 other countries including Syria and El Salvador
Hong Kong opposition activists remained largely silent on Saturday, after US Senator Ted Cruz blocked a last-minute attempt by fellow lawmakers to push through legislation that would have given dissidents from the city special refugee status.
The reticence stood in stark contrast to the response from their counterparts based overseas who expressed disappointment with the move and voiced concern over the safety of Hong Kong protesters in the US.
Taking to the Senate floor to thwart the attempt on Friday, Cruz, of Texas, called the legislation an attempt by Democrats “to advance their long-standing goals on changing [US] immigration laws”, and claimed that Beijing would exploit relaxed immigration standards to send spies to the US.
Those who could benefit from the bill, called the Hong Kong People’s Freedom and Choice Act, would be subject to background security checks.
Under the bill, Hongkongers would be granted temporary protected status (TPS), joining citizens from 10 other countries including Syria, El Salvador and South Sudan. With TPS, those already living in the US, such as students, would be allowed to stay on in the country past the expiry of their current visa.
Hong Kong national security law has ‘chilling effect’ on freedoms, says UN human rights chief
Opposition figures in Hong Kong contacted by the Post appeared reluctant to be drawn into the issue or express much disappointment. Those in the US, however, raised hope that the new government would be receptive.
Joey Siu, a local activist who recently testified in the US Senate on Hong Kong issues, said it was now up to president-elect Joe Biden’s incoming administration to provide a safe harbour for Hongkongers seeking refuge.
“We are also hoping to see bipartisanship pressure in urging the incoming administration to adopt tough China policies,” said Siu, also an associate of Hong Kong Watch, a London-based advocacy group.
Beyond offering TPS, the bill would also require expedited processing of political asylum applications from Hongkongers who could demonstrate a well-founded fear of persecution.
Despite its recent unanimous passage in the House of Representatives, Cruz sought to portray the bill as part of Democrats’ “partisan political agenda” to “embrace open borders” and make all immigration legal.
With Senators soon to leave Washington for the winter break, Cruz’s objection makes it all but certain that the bill will not pass the Senate in time to be sent to the White House before Congress goes on recess, and will have to be reintroduced in January.
Led by Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, Democrats had hoped to squeeze the bill through by a mechanism known as “unanimous consent”, where time-consuming votes are dispensed with to expedite the passage of typically non-controversial bills. Any senator can stand to object to the motion.
China strikes back at US diplomats after fresh national security law sanctions
The blockage by Cruz was met with anger among pro-democracy advocates, including those living in the US who had hoped to benefit from the bill’s provisions.
“I’m enraged,” said Jeffrey Ngo, a Georgetown University PhD student and an activist whose advocacy work has included meeting with US lawmakers. “[Cruz’s] actions today have single-handedly endangered the safety and security of me and others just like me – Hong Kong protesters currently in the US.”
“I cannot agree [with] his dismissal of the positive impact that this bill can have to the lives of real people,” Ngo said. “And not just the lives of real people, but the people who he purports to support.”
Cruz has positioned himself on Capitol Hill as a vocal advocate for Hong Kong’s pro-democracy movement, as one of a number of lawmakers, both Republican and Democrat, who have argued for a stronger US policy to counter Beijing.
But the issue of whether to accept more refugees from Hong Kong has exposed cracks in the bipartisan consensus, given Republican Party members’ general resistance to pro-immigration policies.
In a hearing on Wednesday to discuss ways the US could provide support to Hongkongers seeking political asylum, Cruz skirted the issue of immigration altogether, instead asking broad questions about witnesses’ motivations for opposing Beijing and the prevalence of US flags in Hong Kong’s protests.
Recent years have seen the Trump administration slash quotas of political refugees the US can receive, fuelling concerns among critics of a dismantling of the country’s long-standing status as a safe haven for those fleeing persecution.
Former Hong Kong opposition lawmaker Ted Hui seeking exile in the UK
For financial year 2021, the Trump administration has set the refugee ceiling at a historic low of 15,000. By contrast, the final year of the Obama administration saw the quota set at 110,000 refugees.
“America is currently shutting out the most vulnerable, and to me that is disgraceful,” said Senator Robert Menendez, Democrat of New Jersey, during Wednesday’s hearing.
Following his blockage of the Hong Kong People’s Freedom and Choice Act, Cruz on Friday sought to move a bill of his own that has languished in Congress with no co-sponsors since its introduction in May. Called the SCRIPT Act, Cruz’s bill would prohibit Hollywood studios from receiving US federal funds unless they vow not to amend productions at the request of Chinese government officials.
The bill, which had little chance of moving beyond the Senate given it does not yet have approval in the House, was blocked in turn by Democrats.
“We want to tell Senator Cruz that one needs not to pick between preventing [Chinese Communist Party] censorship on the screen or saving brave activists from life in prison,” said Samuel Chu, founding head of the US-based Hong Kong Democracy Council, in a statement.
“Refusing to send Hongkongers back to become political prisoners and calling out atrocities in Xinjiang are not mutually exclusive. Fighting against the [Chinese Communist Party] and standing with Hong Kong requires every tool at our disposal.”
Additional reporting by Jacob Fromer