Advertisement
Advertisement
US-China tech war
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
Former University of Tennessee associate professor Hu Anming has been accused of wire fraud and lying to Nasa about his ties to Beijing University of Technology. Photo: Blount County Sheriff’s Office

Calls grow for US to dismiss ‘Nasa lies’ case of Hu Anming, as critics cite ‘racial bias’ in accusation that he hid ties to Chinese university

  • Group ‘outraged’ at plan to retry Hu for wire fraud and lying to Nasa about Beijing University of Technology link, after previous trial fell apart
  • ‘What happened to Professor Hu and his family is part of systemic racial bias,’ says letter backing scientist, who was earlier accused of being a Beijing spy
Civil rights organisations and academics sent letters in recent weeks to a US federal court, urging the judge to acquit former University of Tennessee professor Hu Anming – who is accused of lying to Nasa about his China ties and committing wire fraud — without retrying the case.

On Friday, advocacy group APA Justice Task Force sent a letter to Judge Thomas Varlan of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, who presides over the case, to express “outrage to the Department of Justice’s intent to retry” the case, and calling for it to be dismissed. Nine other organisations including Asian Americans Advancing Justice and Asian-American Community Service Council co-signed the letter.

The Department of Justice first investigated Hu, a tenured professor at the university’s department of mechanical, aerospace and biomedical engineering, on suspicion that he spied for China.

When the US government brought charges against Hu in February 2020, it dropped the espionage case, and instead charged him with wire fraud and making false statements for hiding his relationship with the Beijing University of Technology in grant applications he had made to Nasa.

The US government charged Hu Anming with wire fraud and making false statements when applying for grants from Nasa. His case ended in a mistrial. Photo: Reuters
Hu’s case ended in a mistrial after the jury said it could not agree on whether to convict him. The US government said they would pursue a retrial at the end of last month.

“Both the indictment and the trial showed that Professor Hu’s case has nothing to do with theft of American trade secrets,” APA’s letter said. “To the Asian-American community, what happened to Professor Hu and his family is part of systemic racial bias, discrimination, and profiling by our federal government against scientists and researchers of Asian descent across the country.”

APA joined at least two other organisations in sending letters to the judge advocating for the case to be thrown out.

Meng Wanzhou’s marathon Canadian extradition hearings are over

The Committee of Concerned Scientists (CCS), a non-government organisation protecting human rights and the scientific freedom of scientists and scholars, and Carl Patton, professor emeritus at Colorado State University, both sent letters to Varlan earlier this month, calling for the dismissal of the case.

“The case of Dr Hu and many similar cases tried in the US in recent years stem to a large degree from the failure of the government to clearly spell out rules related to foreign collaborations on unclassified research and the differences of these rules for different countries,” the co-chairs of the CCS said. “Chinese-American researchers have been disproportionately affected by this failure.”

Patton said the trial is “a great embarrassment” to the US government.

The US Department of Justice building in Washington on July 22. Photo: AFP

The fact that the DOJ has decided to retry the case “shows their continuing intent in their unrelenting campaign to punish innocent scientists and professors essentially ‘to teach these Chinese spies a lesson’, as one of the prosecutors screamed out during the trial”, he said.

Shortly after the letters, Francis Hamilton III, acting United States attorney for the Eastern District of Tennessee, denied the defendant’s lawyer’s motion to dismiss the case.

Hu, 52, a naturalised Canadian citizen, was the first defendant in a non-espionage case to go to trial under the China Initiative, a Justice Department programme set up in 2018 to investigate trade secret theft and economic espionage activities considered threats to national security. The charges Hu faced were filed only after the FBI failed to develop evidence of espionage.

Taliban’s return ‘boosts morale’ of militant groups in Southeast Asia

The mistrial gave fresh momentum to the effort to investigate whether the department has used the programme against Asians in espionage cases. Just before the US government announced its decision to retry Hu’s case, a group of about 90 lawmakers urged Attorney General Merrick Garland to investigate the China Initiative.

In the letter, the lawmakers said they were “deeply troubled” about whether the programme has been used to target people based on their race, ethnicity, or national origin.

Last week, Eric Lander, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), said the US had to “assiduously avoid basing policies or processes on prejudice – including those that could fuel anti-Asian sentiments or xenophobia”.

04:26

Chinese-American scientists fear US racial profiling

Chinese-American scientists fear US racial profiling

“Prejudice is fundamentally unacceptable, and will backfire because it will make it harder to attract the best scientific minds from around the world,” said Lander.

“We must affirm the integral role of Asian-Americans, Native Hawaiians, Pacific Islanders, and people of all national origins in this country; welcome international students and scholars; and avoid casting aspersions on people because of their identity or origins.”

“Multiple people who happened to be of Asian descent have been falsely accused by the Department of Justice of espionage,” the letter said, citing cases of Taiwanese-American scientist Wen Ho Lee, hydrologist Sherry Chen, and Temple University physicist Xiaoxing Xi.

Other recently dropped cases included the ones against University of Virginia robotics researcher Hu Haizhou, and former Cleveland Clinic researcher Qing Wang.

10