Advertisement

Trump tariffs brought China to table, halted India-Pakistan conflict, officials tell court

Commerce chief calls ‘tenuous ceasefire’ between South Asian rivals a direct result of president’s power to use levies as a diplomatic tool

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
43
US President Donald Trump (centre) with two of his administration’s top officials, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent (left) and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. Photo: AP
Khushboo Razdanin Washington
The Trump administration’s top officials have urged a US court to uphold the president’s sweeping tariff powers, warning that a legal setback could upend an “asymmetric” trade truce with China, embarrass Washington and reignite conflict between India and Pakistan.

The officials claimed that Trump used his tariff power to broker a ceasefire between New Delhi and Islamabad earlier this month and bring about a fragile peace. They further cautioned that trade negotiations with dozens of countries remained in a “delicate state”, with a July 7 deadline to finalise deals fast approaching.

Trump’s use of tariffs as a policy tool has elicited criticism from his opponents over unclear goals and inconsistent messaging in a vaguely defined push to restore American manufacturing.

Advertisement
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, and Secretary of State and National Security Adviser Marco Rubio submitted their statements on Friday to the New York-based Court of International Trade, in response to a lawsuit filed by a coalition of small American businesses challenging US President Donald Trump’s tariffs.

A three-judge panel at the court is considering whether Trump’s use of a “national emergency” was legally justified to support the tariffs.

Advertisement

If the court limited Trump’s authority, Lutnick argued, “foreign counterparts will have reduced incentives to reach meaningful agreements” and it would “destroy the carefully crafted China trade agreement, which is asymmetric in America’s favour, in order to address the emergency of our persistent goods trade deficit”.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x