US lawmakers introduce bill to boost ties with Taiwan amid tensions with Beijing
- Legislation would mandate that US President Donald Trump review state department guidelines on relations with self-ruled island
- Bill would also direct defence department to make efforts to include Taiwan in military training exercises and support arms sales
US lawmakers on Tuesday introduced legislation seeking to boost Washington’s relations with Taiwan and raise the island’s international profile, which could heighten tensions with Beijing.
Senator Bob Menendez, the top Democrat on the influential foreign relations committee, along with Republican Senators Tom Cotton and Ted Cruz, and Democratic Senators Catherine Cortez Masto and Chris Coons offered the “Taiwan Assurance Act”.
Representative Michael McCaul, the top Republican on the House of Representatives foreign affairs committee, plans to introduce a companion measure in the House.
“This legislation would deepen bilateral security, economic and cultural relations, while also sending a message that China’s aggressive cross-Strait behaviour will not be tolerated,” Cotton said in a statement.
To become law, the measure would have to pass the Senate and House and be signed by Trump. Its passage would rankle Beijing as the US and China are edging towards a possible deal to ease a months-long tariff dispute.
Chinese city shreds 29,000 maps showing Taiwan as a country
Taiwan is one of a growing number of flashpoints in the US-China relationship, which also include the trade war, US sanctions and China’s increasingly muscular military posture in the South China Sea, where the United States also conducts freedom of navigation patrols.
Washington has no formal ties with Taiwan but is bound by law to help defend the self-ruled island and is its main source of arms. The Pentagon says Washington has sold Taiwan more than US$15 billion in weaponry since 2010.
Beijing has been ramping up pressure to assert its sovereignty over the island, which it considers a wayward province of “one China”.
