Advertisement
Advertisement
Xinjiang
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
Yu Jianhua, head of China's mission to the UN Office in Geneva, Switzerland, wrote to fellow diplomats last month urging them to stay away from a US-organised event on March 13 about China’s treatment of Uygurs and other Muslim minorities in Xinjiang. He is seen speaking during the 40th session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva on March 13. Photo: Xinhua

UN diplomats and activists describe Chinese pressure and ‘threats’ over Uygur event at UN rights council

  • The US-organised event on March 13 about China’s treatment of Uygurs in Xinjiang province attracted intense lobbying from China’s mission
  • A letter signed by China’s Ambassador Yu Jianhua told countries not to take part ‘in the interest of our bilateral relations’
Xinjiang

Diplomats and activists on Monday denounced intense Chinese lobbying and “threats” to rein in criticism of Beijing during last month’s session of the United Nations Human Rights Council in Switzerland.

Human Rights Watch (HRW) charged that the Chinese mission in Geneva had sent a letter to a number of missions urging them to stay away from a US-organised event on March 13 about China’s treatment of Uygurs and other Muslim minorities in Xinjiang province.

The letter, signed by Ambassador Yu Jianhua and seen by reporters, tells countries “not to co-sponsor, participate in or be present at this side event … in the interest of our bilateral relations and continued multilateral cooperation.”

HRW slammed these “threats”, with the organisation’s Geneva director John Fisher warning that the public outcry over the treatment of Muslim minorities had “sent China into panic mode”.

According to Human Rights Watch, Chinese officials pressured the UN to block the accreditation of Uygur activist Dolkun Isa. Photo: Reuters

Chinese officials, he said in a statement, are now “using public as well as private pressure to block concerted international action”.

The Chinese mission did not immediately respond to a request for confirmation and comment.

But several diplomats confirmed that their missions had received the letter ahead of the event.

It took place on the sidelines of the rights council’s three-week session and focused on allegations that upwards of one million Uygurs and other mostly Muslim Turkic minorities are being held in detention centres in Xinjiang.

China maintains that the Uygurs and others are at campuses for vocational training set up to counter radicalisation.

Xinjiang, which shares a border with several countries including Pakistan and Afghanistan, has long seen violent unrest, which China claims is orchestrated by an organised terrorist movement seeking the region’s independence.

Many Uygurs and Xinjiang experts say that the violence stems largely from spontaneous outbursts of anger at Chinese cultural and religious repression, and that Beijing plays up terrorism to justify tight control of the resource-rich region.

On Monday, several diplomats backed HRW’s claim that China had exerted significant pressure on countries to speak on its behalf during the conclusion of a review of its rights record before the council on March 15.

“They were doing their best to stage-manage everything,” said a Western diplomat, speaking on condition of anonymity.

“When you see how few countries spoke up about Xinjiang, I am sure it did have an effect,” the diplomat added.

“They are not staying idle,” another Western diplomat said.

According to HRW, Chinese officials pressured the UN to remove elements provided by UN experts and NGOs from the so-called Universal Periodic Review (UPR) report and tried to block the accreditation of Uygur activist Dolkun Isa.

A UN official said that “receiving pressure from governments attempting to silence critics is fairly common, but a particularly high number of these complaints come from China about the credibility of participants”.

“This session was particularly bad,” acknowledged the UN official, who asked not to be named.

HRW also charged that China had intentionally pushed friendly states to flood the speakers’ list for the 20 minutes allocated to countries’ concluding remarks.

Nearly 100 countries requested the right to speak – over three times more than usual in this situation – but only 13 were permitted to take the floor.

In advance, the rights council drew the name of the first country, Mali, from a hat, and from there countries were called upon in alphabetical order, through to the Philippines.

This meant that most critical voices from Europe and North America were not called upon, with only Norway speaking up against China’s Xinjiang policies.

Non-governmental organisations were also given a chance to speak, but there too, groups praising China grabbed six of the 10 available speaking slots.

“It speaks volumes that China felt it necessary to twist arms and mount propaganda displays to try to suppress scrutiny of its rights record,” Fisher said.

Post