European nations ‘determined to stay relevant’ in Asia-Pacific, South China Sea
- As tensions rise in the region, heavyweights like Britain, Germany and France are keen to show they are more than just passive trading partners, analysts say
- Sending warships to the disputed waters also ‘provides European governments with more leverage’ when dealing with the US and China on geopolitical matters closer to home
“Until a few years ago, European countries preferred to keep a low profile on regional security issues in East Asia, but under the present circumstances there is a new urgency to be involved,” said Frans-Paul van der Putten, a senior research fellow at the Clingendael Institute, an independent think tank in the Netherlands.
“Sending warships to the South China Sea can provide European governments with more leverage when it comes to dealing with the US and China on geopolitical matters closer to home.
Van der Putten’s assessment comes after Britain, France and Germany said in a joint statement late last month that they were “concerned about the situation in the South China Sea, which could lead to insecurity and tension in the region”.
They also appealed to all parties involved in territorial disputes in the waters to “take steps and measures that reduce tensions, and contribute to maintaining and promoting peace, security, stability and safety in the region”.
China, which claims most of the South China Sea as its sovereign territory, is engaged in multiple disputes with its neighbours, including Malaysia, Vietnam, the Philippines and Brunei.
While the United States is not a claimant, it regards the area as part of its Indo-Pacific strategy to contain China’s military expansion in the Pacific and Indian oceans.
In an apparent show of strength and unity, the US and Britain conducted a joint naval drill in the South China Sea in February, while France sailed its naval assault ship Dixmude and a frigate close to the disputed Spratly Islands last year.
Speaking in London last week Major General Su Guanghui, China’s defence attaché to Britain said: “If the US and UK join hands in a challenge or violate the sovereignty and territorial integrity of China, that would be hostile action.”
Vietnam’s foreign ministry spokesman, Le Thi Thu Hang, said on Friday that Hanoi welcomed all activities that aimed to ensure freedom of navigation and overflight in the disputed waters.
Despite their military cooperation, the US and Europe have their differences on the economic and political fronts.
“They are trying, and succeeding, in depreciating the Euro against the VERY strong Dollar, hurting US exports,” he said.
Last month, Trump criticised the French government over its digital services tax, which he said was aimed at US tech companies, and vowed to retaliate by taxing French wine.
Donald Tusk, president of the European Council, said the EU would “respond in kind” if the US imposed any such penalties.
The European Union is also embroiled in a bitter dispute with China over what it sees as the unfair treatment of EU businesses operating in the world’s second-biggest economy.
In a paper released earlier in the year, the European Commission urged EU leaders to adopt a 10-point action plan labelling China an “economic competitor” and “a systemic rival promoting alternative models of governance”.
Tensions between Beijing and Berlin escalated this week after German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas met Hong Kong pro-democracy activist Joshua Wong in the German capital on Monday.
China’s foreign ministry said it was “strongly dissatisfied” with the meeting, while the Chinese ambassador to Germany said on Wednesday that his opposite number in Beijing had been summoned to answer for it.
Sarah Raine, a consulting senior fellow for geopolitics and strategy at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London, said it was not surprising the EU wanted to be involved in the South China Sea disputes and expand its influence in the region.
“It is a natural consequence of the reality that in Asia the EU is fed up with being treated as little more than a trading partner, and otherwise irrelevant in the big strategic issues of the continent, even though it has a serious stake in them,” she said.
According to Siemon Wezeman, a senior researcher with the SIPRI Arms Transfers and Military Expenditure Programme in Sweden, the EU is trying to increase its leverage over China and the US by showing that it is also a major player in the disputed waters.
“The EU is not China, and certainly not the Trump’s US. It wants to show it is still there, and still matters,” he said.
“The three signatories to the joint statement (Britain, France and Germany) had particularly strong interests in the region,” Wezeman said.
“They have trade interests … If there is an accident in the South China Sea, the corresponding European industries would be affected.”