Britain could give Hong Kong BN(O) passport holders right of abode, former top UK adviser says
- Former attorney general says the United Kingdom would not be breaching its agreement with China by changing the rules
- Only Britain decides what rights are extended to holders, Peter Goldsmith says
A former British attorney general says Hongkongers holding British National (Overseas) passports should be allowed to resettle in the United Kingdom, accusing the government of depriving them of full citizenship with misleading claims.
In a letter sent to Home Secretary Priti Patel, seen by the South China Morning Post, Peter Goldsmith QC said Britain would not be breaching the Sino-British Joint Declaration by changing the rules and granting this group of Hongkongers the right of abode.
As the main author in charge of a 2008 government review on citizenship, Goldsmith is the strongest legal voice to date in support of what would essentially be a path to full citizenship for hundreds of thousands of Hongkongers with a BN(O) passport.
The passport functions only as a travel document and does not grant the holder the automatic legal right to live or work in Britain. The Sino-British Joint Declaration signed on September 26, 1984, between the British and Chinese government set out the terms of Hong Kong’s return to Chinese sovereignty on July 1, 1997.
The political question about BN(O)s resurfaced last year during violent protests against the Hong Kong government’s extradition bill, when London came under international pressure to consider opening the doors to Hongkongers born before the colonial era came to an end in 1997.
“From the materials I have been able to review, it is my view that the UK government can extend full right of abode to BN(O) passport holders without breaching its side of the Sino-British Joint Declaration,” Goldsmith wrote in the letter dated February 14, a similar version of which was also sent to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
“I said in the 2008 citizenship review that it would be fair to grant greater rights to BN(O) passport holders. I continue to hold this position.”
A Home Office spokesman said: “We continue to believe that the best solution for Hong Kong, and the British National (Overseas) passport holders that live there, is full respect for the rights and freedoms guaranteed in the Sino-British Joint Declaration.”
According to a 2015 British government estimate, 3.4 million people hold BN(O)s, which Hongkongers could apply for before the 1997 return to Chinese sovereignty. Those born after the handover are not eligible.
Last year, in rejecting British citizenship for Hongkongers with BN(O)s, the government cited the 2008 report: “Lord Goldsmith recognised that to automatically give BN(O)s full British citizenship would be a breach of the commitments made between China and the UK in the 1984 joint declaration on the future of Hong Kong.”
In his letter to the home secretary, Goldsmith – who was the British government’s chief legal adviser from 2001 to 2007 under Labour prime minister Tony Blair – said the assertion was “a mischaracterisation of what I said”.
“I want to make it clear: I never intended my report on citizenship to be a statement on any opinion by me that there would be a breach of the arrangements with China if the UK were to offer greater rights,” he said.
“I do not see why the UK government would be in breach of any obligation undertaken in the joint declaration were it to resolve to extend full right of abode to BN(O) passport holders while continuing to honour their side of the Sino-British Joint Declaration.”
Activists have compared the British government’s refusal to change BN(O) status to the Windrush scandal, where the Home Office threatened to deport thousands of people who arrived as children in Britain from the Caribbean decades ago.
“Goldsmith’s powerful letter has unmasked the UK and shown they have learnt nothing from the Windrush scandal,” said Luke de Pulford, fellow at the London-based Hong Kong Watch group and the campaigner who first contacted the former attorney general for clarification.
“It is time for the home secretary to dismiss baseless legal objections from the Foreign Office and to give British nationals in Hong Kong what they need and deserve.”
Goldsmith also suggested that the British government had been relying on a clause that bound it only up to the 1997 handover to justify their denial of BN(O) citizenship today.
Make BN(O) Hongkongers full British citizens, Boris Johnson urged by top political figures as UK election approaches
At question is a memorandum on the right of abode for BDTCs – British Dependent Territories Citizens – that the British negotiation team presented to their Chinese counterparts in the 1980s.
It was under this unilateral memorandum, which Goldsmith said the Chinese side “neither accepted nor agreed to”, that BDTCs were converted to BN(O)s without the right of abode.
“The exchanged memoranda cannot be interpreted as imposing a permanent restriction on how the United Kingdom should treat the status of BN(O)s,” Goldsmith said.
The intention for the BDTC conversion to BN(O) “has already been discharged”, he said, adding: “The memorandum has no relevance to the UK’s present consideration of what rights should be enjoyed by holders of the BN(O) passports in the future. That is a matter solely for the UK.”
Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s government was understood to have revisited citizenship issues for Hongkongers last year, but no public announcement has been made.
Purchase the China AI Report 2020 brought to you by SCMP Research and enjoy a 20% discount (original price US$400). This 60-page all new intelligence report gives you first-hand insights and analysis into the latest industry developments and intelligence about China AI. Get exclusive access to our webinars for continuous learning, and interact with China AI executives in live Q&A. Offer valid until 31 March 2020.