If Nokia and Ericsson can operate in China, our firms should be treated fairly in Europe, Beijing says
- China’s foreign ministry spokesman calls ‘fake news’ on report that Beijing is considering export reprisal against European telecoms if EU bans Huawei
- But he said China expected to trade in a ‘business environment that’s fair, open and indiscriminate’
“The companies have already won bids for some projects in China,” said Wang Wenbin, the foreign ministry spokesman, during Tuesday’s regular press conference in Beijing.
“We oppose certain countries’ generalisation of the concept of national security in banning specific companies from specific countries.”
The report by The Wall Street Journal cited anonymous sources and said the Chinese Ministry’s of Commerce was considering export controls that would prevent Nokia and Ericsson from sending products made in China abroad.
Wang said the article was “fake news” and “aimed at provoking the cooperative ties between China and Europe”. But Wang said he expected European countries to do the same for Chinese telecoms companies.
“We hope European countries could also provide Chinese companies with a business environment that’s fair, open and indiscriminate,” he said.
Last year, Sweden’s Ericsson and Finland’s Nokia were given 34 per cent and 12 per cent of the MME/SGSN equipment orders. MME/SGSN and SAE-GW/GGSN are two types of core network equipment needed for the operation of ultra-fast 5G networks.
The two northern European firms were given 34 per cent and 9 per cent of the SAE-GW/GGSN orders respectively by China Mobile, the country’s largest telecoms operator.
The Trump administration has also pressed US allies to exclude Huawei equipment from next-generation fast 5G networks being built. US officials say Huawei’s network equipment could be used for spying – an allegation the company has contested.
In a set of commonly agreed guidelines released in January on how to mitigate risks from the roll-out of next-generation telecoms networks, the EU said companies based in non-democratic countries could be excluded from the procurement of certain core components, following assessments by security agencies.
The decisions are thus left to individual member states.