Advertisement
Advertisement
Australia
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
The Chinese consulate in Sydney responded angrily to a report one of its officials had been named in a federal investigation. Photo: AP

China-Australia relations: infiltration allegations against Chinese consul ‘vicious slander’

  • Chinese consulate general in Sydney says it is ‘committed to promoting friendly exchanges and pragmatic cooperation’
  • Suggestions consul Sun Yantao engaged in infiltration activities are ‘totally baseless’, it says
Australia
China’s consulate in Sydney has dismissed allegations of political interference following reports a consular official has been identified in an investigation by Australian federal police.
The statement comes amid a months-long investigation into foreign interference in Australia that has enveloped local politicians, Chinese diplomats and journalists, and deepened the growing rift between Canberra and Beijing.

“The accusations that the consulate general and its official engaged in infiltration activities are totally baseless and nothing but vicious slander,” the consulate said in a statement on Wednesday.

“The Chinese consulate general in Sydney is committed to promoting friendly exchanges and pragmatic cooperation in various fields between the Chinese side and New South Wales.

“It always observes international law and basic norms of international relations while exercising its duties in Australia.”

The statement was issued after Australia’s national broadcaster, the ABC, reported on Tuesday that Chinese consul Sun Yantao had been named in search warrants related to an investigation into Shaoquett Moselmane – a member of the Legislative Council of New South Wales who was suspended from the Labor party in June – and his policy adviser John Zhisen Zhang.

Sun, who is responsible for managing relations with the Chinese diaspora and pro-Beijing organisations, was one of several Chinese nationals to be identified, the report said.

Authorities are investigating whether the Sydney consulate conspired with Zhang to “infiltrate the Labor party and influence voters”, it said.

The homes and offices of Moselmane and Zhang were raided by police in June as part of the investigation, which is being run jointly by federal police and the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (Asio).

Relations between Beijing and Canberra worsened after Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison called for an investigation into Beijing’s handling of the coronavirus. Photo: AAP

While Australian officials have defended the investigation, Beijing has responded with outrage, which has put pressure on journalists from the two countries working in each other’s territory.

Warrants cited in the ABC report included Chinese journalists from state media, who were questioned by the Asio on the day of the June raid on Moselman and Zhang.

China’s foreign ministry last week described the investigations into Chinese journalists as “barbaric”.
Australian journalist Cheng Lei was detained in China last month on national security grounds. Last week, Canberra evacuated the last two Australian correspondents in mainland China after they were questioned about Cheng’s case.

Beijing confirmed on Monday that journalists Bill Birtles and Michael Smith had been questioned as a part of “normal law enforcement activities”.

Australia eyes trade with India to cut China reliance amid mounting tensions

Australian Trade Minister Simon Birmingham said last week that the raid on Chinese journalists was “appropriate” and was done “purely in relation to the evidence”.

Relations between China and Australia have plummeted this year. In April, Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison called for an investigation into Beijing’s handling of the coronavirus, drawing the ire of Beijing. China has since imposed restrictions on imports of Australian agricultural products, including beef and wine.

This article appeared in the South China Morning Post print edition as: Sydney consulate rejects claims of interference as ‘baseless, vicious slander’
Post