Advertisement
Meng Wanzhou
ChinaDiplomacy

‘Abhorrent’ remarks by Donald Trump take centre stage at Meng Wanzhou’s extradition hearing

  • The Huawei executive’s lawyers say Trump made ‘intimidating’ threats to intervene in her case, reducing Meng from a human being to ‘chattel’
  • They want the case extradition case thrown out as a result, but Canadian government lawyers say the argument is ‘moot’ because Trump is no longer US president

5-MIN READ5-MIN
19
Huawei Technologies Chief Financial Officer Meng Wanzhou arrives at court following a lunch break in Vancouver, Canada on Monday. Photo: Reuters
Ian Youngin Vancouver
Accusations that former US president Donald Trump irreparably poisoned the fraud case against Huawei Technologies Co. executive Meng Wanzhou by threatening to intervene in her proceedings came under the spotlight at an extradition hearing in Vancouver on Wednesday.

Meng’s lawyer Richard Peck said Trump had “co-opted the extradition process in an attempt to leverage Ms Meng and her extradition status”, when he said soon after her arrest that he “would certainly intervene” in her case to aid his trade war with China.

Peck called the remarks “abhorrent” and an abuse of process, that stained the Canadian justice system and the proceedings against Meng.

Advertisement

“These words cast a pall over these proceedings … They reduce Ms Meng from a human being to a chattel,” Peck said.

Then US president Donald Trump is seen in the Oval Office during an interview with Reuters journalists on December 11, 2018. During the interview, he said he “would certainly intervene” in Meng Wanzhou’s fraud case if it helped strike a trade deal with China. Photo: Reuters
Then US president Donald Trump is seen in the Oval Office during an interview with Reuters journalists on December 11, 2018. During the interview, he said he “would certainly intervene” in Meng Wanzhou’s fraud case if it helped strike a trade deal with China. Photo: Reuters
Advertisement

He also cast Meng’s arrest in grand terms as part of an attempt to destroy Huawei, a firm that posed “an existential threat to [US] prominence on the world stage”.

Meng’s lawyers had earlier said in a written submission: “Where the Requesting State engages in conduct that offends our Canadian sense of fair play and decency, the Court must intervene to safeguard the integrity of the judicial process. This is such a case.”

Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x