China’s embassy in Paris attacks ‘mad dogs’ and defends Wolf Warriors in public row with French scholar
- Diplomatic triangle of Beijing, Paris and Taipei gives rise to Twitter barbs and screed over ‘anti-China provocations’
- Research fellow Antoine Bondaz urges Beijing to ‘stop before it has gone too far’
The harshly worded statement, published on the embassy’s website on Sunday, sought to justify the mission’s attack on Antoine Bondaz, a research fellow at the French think tank Foundation for Strategic Research, as a “petite frappe”, a derogatory term in French meaning “little thug”.
“A few days ago, China’s embassy on its official Twitter account engaged in a legitimate counter-attack to provocative remarks from a so-called China expert in France, sparking the dissatisfaction of some French people and media, and causing a wave of criticism,” the embassy said in its statement, without naming Bondaz.
“Freedom of speech is equal. He has the freedom to provoke the Chinese embassy and we have the freedom to counter-attack. You cannot say that just because he is a scholar, he is sacred so we cannot say anything about him and he cannot be touched.”
The controversy is the latest instance of incendiary rhetoric from the Chinese embassy in France, which observers have said reflects the increasingly aggressive Wolf Warrior style of Beijing’s diplomats abroad.
In its statement on Sunday, the Chinese embassy said it was not “insulting” Bondaz, describing him as someone who “does not count as a scholar” and is “an ideological troll”.
“You can see how he kneels and licks Taiwan’s government, and how he crazily opposes everything related to China, constantly pestering the Chinese embassy,” it said. “If China’s national interests and image have been threatened or harmed, then our embassy must rush out to safeguard it at all costs.”
The embassy compared the label of Wolf Warrior applied to Chinese diplomats with “mad dogs who are too aggressive, including some ‘mad dogs’ who use their status as scholars or the media to crazily attack China”.
“Some people want China’s diplomacy to be ‘lamb diplomacy’, which is more tolerant and calm towards external attacks,” the embassy said. “This era has gone forever.”
Bondaz, whose research includes a focus on China’s foreign and security policy, tweeted that the embassy’s comments were “unjustifiable”.
“The embassy feels it has total impunity,” he wrote, suggesting in Chinese that the embassy “stop before it has gone too far”.
In a separate tweet, the French researcher responded to an opinion piece from the Chinese state-run tabloid Global Times defending the Chinese embassy’s comments, writing that he faced “coordinated attacks” from China meant to “discredit and silence me”.
“This will be a failure,” Bondaz wrote. “This will only prompt me to pursue the very research that [China] is so concerned about.”