Advertisement
Advertisement
Middle East
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi pictured with his Kuwaiti counterpart Sheikh Ahmad Nasser Al-Mohammad Al-Sabah. Pictured: Xinhua

China’s Middle East strategy stays focused on economic relations

  • Recent talks with the Gulf States and Turkey helped boost economic ties, but saw little change in strategic and security matters
  • While China hopes to increase its role in the region, it faces opposition from the US, which remains a key player
Middle East
China’s talks with Middle Eastern countries last week brought progress in economic cooperation, but little in other areas despite Beijing’s desire to play a greater role in the region.

Foreign Minister Wang Yi hosted a series of meetings with his counterparts from the Gulf Cooperation Council and four of its six member states, agreeing to accelerate the process of upgrading relations to a strategic partnership and signing a free-trade agreement.

“The most important outcome of the visit between China and the GCC countries was economic,” Yin Gang, a researcher in the Middle East with the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said.

Wang met foreign ministers from Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman and Bahrain, agreeing to closer cooperation on trade and cultural exchanges.

Beijing has been keen to win support for its policies in Xinjiang, where it is accused to widespread human rights abuses, and secured support from the mainly Muslim states for the principle of non-interference to each other’s domestic policies and mutual support in international institutions.

Wang also held a phone conference on Thursday with his counterpart from another GCC member, the United Arab Emirates, underlining their common interests.

Turkey and Iran, two other major players in the region, have also sent their top diplomats to Beijing this week.

China meets Gulf oil bloc with sights set on trade deal, energy security

Turkey and China also focused more on economic cooperation on Wednesday, while China urged Turkey, which has criticised its policies in Xinjiang, to “abide by the basic norm of international relations of not interfering in each other’s internal affairs’’.

“Apart from specific interests – oil, gas, and hi-tech investments – on a grand strategic scale, China needs stability in this volatile region,” said Zeno Leoni, an affiliate to the Lau China Institute at King’s College London.

“The fact that diplomats from the GCC, Iran and Turkey will be there all at the same time, might be for China to emphasise that it values each of its relations with each regional power and that it hopes to continue to have an equidistant and productive relationship with each of them despite intraregional tensions.”

Jonathan Fulton, an associate professor at Zayed University in the UAE, said the biggest challenge in the Middle East for China was the US, which had deep existing political and security alliances and partnerships throughout the region.

“Middle East and North Africa states are keen to engage with China on several fronts but not at the risk of damaging their relationships with Washington,” he said.

“Unless China is able to offer the same kind of commitments – and thus far it hasn’t been – then there’s a ceiling for its regional presence.”

The US has a heavy security presence in the region with forces stationed in Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Iraq and in the greater Gulf.

Beijing also used the opportunity to discuss the ongoing Iranian nuclear talks – where it is acting as a go-between for the US and Iran – with the Gulf states and Turkey, which are bitter strategic rivals of Tehran.
Wang Yi pictured with Gulf Cooperation Council secretary general Nayef Falah Mubarak Al-Hajraf. Photo: Xinhua

But Yan Wei, deputy director at the Institute of Middle Eastern studies at China’s Northwest University, warned: “There are limits to the involvement of external forces, including China, and their ability to solve the Middle East problem because of its complexity.”

China will one day face the challenge of remaining “neutral” in the region as its influence grows, according to Yahia Zoubir, a France-based fellow at the Middle East Council on Global Affairs.

“It might create a new challenge for China, because many countries in [the Middle East and North Africa] are asking China to play a bigger role in security,” he said. “There will be situations where China needs to be more forthcoming in terms of its position, the country’s neutral strategy will be challenged in the longer run.”

China has repeatedly offered to “contribute to peace and development in the Middle East”, but there is little to show from this so far.

Saudi coalition accuses Yemeni rebels of militarising seaports

During Wang’s tour of the Middle East last year, he offered to support nuclear non-proliferation, collective security and economic diversification. He also offered to host peace talks between the Israelis and the Palestinians.

But Zoubir said the Middle East was not an urgent security concern for China, which also wanted to avoid the impression of being “an expansionist power”.

Wang Jin, an associate professor at the Institute of Middle East studies at China’s Northwest University, said the US was pressuring its allies in the region to keep their distance from China.

In December, media reports said Israel had been pushed to “pick sides” between China and the United States. Axios reported that Israeli officials had reassured the White House they would be “more transparent” about Chinese investments following talks in Washington.

Iran fires ballistic missiles during war games in warning to Israel

Fulton said China appeared to be focusing its regional goals on economic objectives, including its transcontinental infrastructure initiative, the Belt and Road Initiative.

“[In the] long term, I imagine Beijing’s goal is to integrate the region more deeply into its orbit, using the belt and road and digital silk road to deepen cooperation on a wide range of issues that support China’s preferences for a less US or European-dominated international order.”

3