Advertisement
Advertisement
US-China relations
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
Matthew Pottinger, shown during a hearing of the US House select committee on China, supported the Biden administration’s publicising the possibility that China is considering providing arms to Russia. Photo: Getty Images via AFP

Former China adviser to Trump praises Antony Blinken for saying Beijing may supply arms to Russia

  • ‘I have to believe that [Blinken] would not have made this public unless … he had high confidence in it,’ Matthew Pottinger says
  • China denies the claim, but if it is true, ‘Beijing may believe that it has an interest in prolonging the war as long as possible’

A former top official on China in the Donald Trump administration praised US Secretary of State Antony Blinken on Monday for publicising the White House’s concern that Beijing is considering supplying lethal aid to Russia in its war on Ukraine.

“I actually commend [Blinken] for calling out Beijing’s plans publicly,” said Matthew Pottinger, the top Asia adviser on Trump’s National Security Council. “I have to believe that [Blinken] would not have made this public unless he believed that he had high confidence in it.”

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken at the Munich Security Conference on February 18, where he said that China might be considering supplying Russia with lethal military aid. Photo: AP
Pottinger told The Washington Post that warnings by top government officials, including US President Joe Biden; Blinken; Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen; and Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo “bought a year … of Beijing restraint” in terms of direct military support to Russia.
Pottinger, who testified last week at a hearing of the new House select committee on China, said that if it was true that “Beijing is very seriously contemplating” providing Russia such support, he thought it was “a very bad sign”.

“It means that Beijing is really looking to see whether it can find ways, covert ways, to move all that equipment that Russia needs into that conflict,” Pottinger, now a visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution, added.

China has repeatedly denied the claim, accusing Washington of spreading “false information”.

China’s possible involvement has become one of the most important factors in determining how long the war in Ukraine will continue. Russian President Vladimir Putin has shown no inclination to stop even though Ukraine’s military has so far held off the invasion.

With the US and other Nato member nations assisting Ukraine’s efforts with missile systems, ammunition and commitments to send advanced tanks, the possibility of Beijing entering the fray with lethal military hardware raises the prospects of a deeper conflict pitting Beijing and Moscow against Washington and its allies.

“I think that Xi Jinping’s original hope was probably very much aligned with Putin’s … for a very rapid victory by Russia over Ukraine,” Pottinger said.

A year later, he continued, “Beijing may believe that it has an interest in prolonging the war as long as possible to drain Western attention, Nato attention … to create a more favourable strategic situation in the western Pacific, including around Taiwan”.

Pottinger’s concerns echoed those voiced by another Trump-era official. Fiona Hill, who served as the director for European and Russian affairs at the National Security Council under Trump, told the Senate Armed Services Committee last month that Beijing may be looking to prolong the Ukraine war.

At a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on February 15, Fiona Hill said Beijing might be looking to prolong the Ukraine war. Photo: Getty Images via AFP

“China has no interest in Russia losing in this war, and might in fact have a vested interest in this war going on in Ukraine as long as possible, because it does take up a large amount of equipment and armaments, particularly ammunition and then the increasing demands from Ukraine … for other equipment,” said Hill, now a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution’s Centre on the United States and Europe.

Pottinger has supported robust efforts to counter Beijing’s more assertive posture on Taiwan, but said he would not recommend putting the island under the US “nuclear umbrella”.

Beijing considers Taiwan to be a wayward province that must eventually be united with the mainland, by force if necessary. As is the case with many Western countries, the US does not recognise the island as an independent state. But Washington is committed by law to support Taiwan’s military defence – a stance Beijing strongly opposes.

02:58

China denounces US approval of US$619 million sale of missiles and military equipment to Taiwan

China denounces US approval of US$619 million sale of missiles and military equipment to Taiwan

“There are conventional means to deter an ill-advised war that Xi Jinping is clearly considering right now,” Pottinger said.

“We need to start talking about the ways that Beijing may seek to threaten escalation dominance – including all the way up the ladder to nuclear – and some of the things that we would do and then our allies would do.

“I don’t think that it’s necessary to take the step of of declaring proactively that Taiwan is under our umbrella,” he added. “Remember, we’re trying to maintain the status quo; we’re not trying to change it.”

46