Advertisement
China-EU relations
ChinaDiplomacy

4 lost years: how the EU fumbled its response to China’s belt and road with Global Gateway strategy

  • Internal documents show European Commission rejected prescient 2020 proposal because it would ‘send wrong signal’ to China
  • Months-long investigation reveals a bureaucracy fighting tooth and nail against EU’s signature Global Gateway strategy

Reading Time:7 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
41
Illustration: Lau Ka-kuen
Finbarr Berminghamin Brussels
EU leaders will gather in Brussels this week to toast their flagship infrastructure drive Global Gateway, launched to much fanfare in 2021 as an alternative to China’s Belt and Road Initiative.

But internal documents and conversations with 10 sources involved in the EU’s infrastructure discussions reveal a bureaucracy that fought tooth and nail against using connectivity as a foreign policy tool.

A months-long investigation paints an unflattering picture of European Commission infighting, turf wars and inaction that jars with the muscular rhetoric presented by its leader, Ursula von der Leyen.

Advertisement
For von der Leyen, Global Gateway embodies a new, geopolitical EU that is ready to face an increasingly intensive competition with China, epitomised by Beijing’s massive belt and road infrastructure plan, which has just celebrated its first decade.

Documents seen by the South China Morning Post, however, shed light on conflicting European attitudes over how best to deal with the implications of Beijing’s growing influence in the developing world.

Advertisement

One document in particular, dated October 2020, shows the commission spurning a concrete proposal to compete with China – in part out of fear of “sending the wrong signal” to Beijing.

06:32

China’s Belt and Road, 10 years on

China’s Belt and Road, 10 years on
Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x