Advertisement
Advertisement
US-China relations
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
US President Joe Biden boards Air Force One at San Francisco International Airport on Friday after attending the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit. Photo: AFP

Xi-Biden summit hit pause on troubled US-China relations, delivering some modest deals: analysts

  • Improved military-to-military dialogue, coordination on fentanyl and meeting of minds on AI singled out as noteworthy takeaways from Apec discussion
  • But both leaders’ domestic political challenges could undo progress given deep bilateral differences and tenuous trust, analysts say
This week’s meeting between Xi Jinping and Joe Biden met the very low expectations that both sides telegraphed well in advance, effectively hitting the pause button on deteriorating bilateral relations and delivering a few modest agreements.
But the problems are too entrenched, the trust too tenuous and the political calendar too fraught by coming elections in Taiwan and the US to achieve the fundamental reset that global leaders and chief executives want.

“Neither side was willing to negotiate on major concessions,” said Kurt Tong, a former US consul general in Hong Kong now with The Asia Group, a business consultancy.

“We have at least six months from where we are now to stabilise the competitive relationship,” Tong said. “But then the US election starts to heat up, with the Taiwan government transition coming in the summer.”
The bilateral talks held on the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in San Francisco – the most important meeting between any two leaders this year – saw Biden and Xi walking a similarly difficult line.

Both were eager to slash the odds that a US-China crisis would distract from their domestic concerns, even as the two were keen to ensure they did not appear weak in the eyes of hardliners back home.

“Each side issued parallel statements with a different framing of the relationship,” including their views on geopolitics and economic competition, said Dominic Chiu of Eurasia Group, a New York-based consultancy.

“Trading sentiment in part recognised the lack of progress made in resolving these long-term, structural differences between the US and China, with Chinese stocks falling soon after the meeting.”

Chinese President Xi’s welcome mat may not be enough for US investors

While the two sides have a shared interest in stability, the US came away with two items atop its wish list, analysts said.

“The administration effectively traded high-profile symbolism for practical commitments on the part of the Chinese,” said Evan S. Medeiros, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and former National Security Council official. “That’s a pretty good deal.”

One of Biden’s wins was an agreement to enhance communication between the Pentagon and the People’s Liberation Army, reducing the chance of an accidental mishap and the risk calculations in regional capitals.
Reconnecting so-called military-to-military channels severed after then-House speaker Nancy Pelosi visited Taiwan in August last year was a high priority for Washington, following a year of American military and political officials pleading publicly with their Chinese counterparts to pick up the phone.
Beijing ceded some ground in this area given its view that military guard rails legitimise America’s presence in the waters and airspace around Taiwan and the South China Sea, even as it secured reassurances and a restatement of the one-China policy.
Chinese President Xi Jinping listens during an Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation meeting in San Francisco on Friday. Xi’s attendance at the annual conference had been uncertain until just before it began. Photo: Bloomberg
Biden also took away a relatively significant political win as Beijing pledged a willingness to crack down on the export of ingredients used to make fentanyl. The drug kills some 70,000 Americans annually, and the scourge it has wrought is something that average Americans otherwise uninterested in foreign policy can relate to.
In other headway, the US and China reached an apparent meeting of the minds on AI. “Xi Jinping of China and I had a brief discussion about the impact of artificial intelligence and how we have to work on it,” Biden told Apec leaders on Friday.
The willingness to cooperate on the use and governance of AI came as Washington cranks up export limits on high-end semiconductors, a position that Beijing deeply resents.
Biden left California able to project to American voters the image of a knowledgeable and steady hand guiding US foreign policy relative to the often erratic moves of his likely Republican political opponent, former president Donald Trump.

US, China must curb national security impact on trade: commerce minister

The American president also arrived at Apec buoyed by strong economic numbers indicating growth, low unemployment and declining inflation.

Biden’s standing differed markedly from the political situation confronting Xi, who is battling a slower-than-expected post-pandemic recovery, rising unemployment and declining foreign investment.

The Chinese leader only confirmed his Apec attendance days before he arrived – late even by Beijing’s standards. Xi also declined an invitation to speak publicly to Apec’s 21 member economies. Instead, he focused on a smaller dinner meant to reassure business leaders who paid up to US$40,000 per seat to hear in person that China was open for business.

But rebuilding investor confidence will take time in view of recent raids on foreign companies and tightening national security restrictions.

Xi Jinping offers cooperation, reassurance during US business dinner

“The business community has heard promises about ‘reform and opening’ from Beijing before, but business risk in China is not going down,” said Daniel Russel of the Asia Society Policy Institute and formerly with the State Department.

“It will take concrete and sustained action, not platitudes, for Beijing to rebuild confidence.”

Xi, for his part, was able to project images back home of a leader respected on the world stage in line with Beijing’s stance opposing American “hegemonic” power.

The Chinese president also gained a small concession from the US side with the lifting of American sanctions on the Institute of Forensic Science, a unit of China’s public security ministry. Sanctions commenced in 2020 over the reported detention of up to 1 million ethnic Uygurs in Xinjiang Uygur autonomous province.
The development slowed the growing body of US sanctions imposed on China over human rights, defence and national security concerns.

It also undercut Washington’s argument that decisions are made solely on merit, not politics, while providing fuel for Republican critics who claim Biden is selling out to Beijing.

And despite the US hosting Apec as well as the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework trade groupings this week, Biden’s inability to secure an already watered-down IPEF trade agreement in the face of American political opposition contrasted sharply with China’s assertive regional presence.

With the two economic giants elbowing for pole position, Washington has been unable to offer any movement on trade liberalisation, which is opposed by many Republicans and Democrats, even as China forges ahead with its bid to strengthen its regional grip.

Since Trump pulled the US out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership in 2017, China has forged ahead with the Beijing-led Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership free-trade agreement even as a successor to the TPP has stalled from a lack of US participation.

Not quite Mar-a-Lago as Xi breaks the ice with Biden, 6 years after Trump summit

This “makes the US look unreliable, while Xi will continue to promise all sorts of increased trade access and economic linkages”, said Bill Bishop, author of the influential newsletter Sinocism.

Despite the long-anticipated meeting, neither side has altered its essential view of the other, analysts added.

“Correctly or incorrectly, China believes that the US is determined to block China’s inevitable rise,” said Stephen Olson of the Asia-based Hinrich Foundation.

“Correctly or incorrectly, the US believes that China is a disruptive force determined to usurp the US-led post-war global system.”

The various bilateral meetings leading up to the summit and pledged future meetings represent an important clearing of blocked political arteries, especially on the Chinese side where top-down signalling is vital to set direction for the bureaucracy.

Xi and Biden working to enhance trust, says Chinese foreign minister

As a consequence, cooperation has improved in matters as varied as visas and tourism, nuclear weapons talks, global warming and people-to-people exchanges, in addition to the San Francisco “deliverables” addressing illicit drugs, the militaries and AI.
The slight lowering of tensions between Washington and Beijing also opens the door for US allies to engage further with Beijing, noteworthy as Japan, South Korea and China prepare to hold their first trilateral summit since 2019.

Although China’s one-party state entertains few overt political challenges, state media leading up to the meeting seeded the ground for a conciliatory shift after months of harsh anti-US rhetoric.

“Once opened, the door of China-US relations cannot be shut again,” said Mao Ning, China’s foreign ministry spokeswoman, on Friday.

Such language echoed Xi’s remarks in San Francisco, when he stated: “Once started, the cause of China-US friendship cannot be derailed halfway. No matter how the global landscape evolves, the historical trend of peaceful coexistence between China and the United States will not change.”

Unofficial exchanges soared ahead of Xi-Biden meeting to smooth path for talks

Xi’s support for improved ties is a tactical shift, however, that could easily be reversed.

Biden’s assurances and extended effort to meet with Xi could be undone should he lose America’s presidential election next year. A rambunctious US Congress could push the limits on Taiwan, tech and sanctions, making Xi look weak back home.

And given the dearth of trust, a single military accident could derail the nascent warming.

The restoration of these minimal lines of communication is only likely to “buy down a small part of the risk”, according to Isaac Kardon of CEIP, a Washington-based think tank.

“Another major incident such as the 2001 EP-3 collision would be nearly impossible to de-escalate.”
19