South China Sea: Hague ruling rejected by Beijing still casts long shadow over dispute
- With Manila willing to return to talks despite clashes, Beijing should respond positively and avoid ‘nightmarish scenario’ of another arbitration

According to people with knowledge of the situation, Beijing remains deeply worried about the lasting impact of the 2016 ruling, which marked a legal precedent for dispute settlement and a turning point in China’s ties with its neighbours in Southeast Asia.
Although China gained the upper hand in what started as a fishing dispute in 2012 near the contested Scarborough Shoal, known as Huangyan Island in China and Panatag Shoal in the Philippines, it was the trigger for Manila to take the matter to the Hague-based tribunal the following year.
That was doubtlessly one of the most important moments in the internationalisation of the South China Sea dispute, defying strong opposition from Beijing.
The ruling dealt a major blow to Beijing’s claims over much of the disputed waters under what it calls its historic “nine-dash line”, and has since been deemed a taboo topic in Chinese interactions with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean), several mainland-based observers said.
