appConfigEntityId

bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

isVideo

articlePageQuery

article

articleSchemaContent

content

hooksArticlePageAdvertisementConfigArticle

appConfig

filter

json

liveArticle

Orange Wang

The era when the three joint communiques set the terms of US-China relations may have “completely come to an end”, a prominent Chinese analyst has warned.
Zhu Feng, dean of Nanjing University’s School of International Studies, also said that it might be “unrealistic” to expect Beijing and Washington to reach a comprehensive political understanding on Taiwan, given US domestic politics.
Following Chinese President Xi Jinping’s highly anticipated summit with US counterpart Donald Trump earlier this month, Beijing announced that the leaders had agreed to build a “constructive relationship of strategic stability”, calling it a major milestone.
The White House later echoed the phrase, adding that it should operate “on the basis of fairness and reciprocity”.


According to Zhu, this demonstrated a mutual effort to align their perceptions and policy frameworks, effectively laying fresh groundwork for future ties.
“The substantive normative effect of the three joint communiques on China-US relations has completely come to an end,” he said during an online seminar hosted by the Macau Centre for Regional and Strategic Studies on Friday to review Trump’s visit to Beijing.
The most important aspect of current bilateral interactions was no longer whether the two sides could produce new communiques or joint statements, Zhu said.
Rather, what mattered was how Beijing and Washington could achieve constructive outcomes on specific policies via pragmatic exchanges, he asserted, saying they had entered a “structural, long-term and strategic” competition.
Signed in 1972, 1978 and 1982, the three Sino-US joint communiques have formed the political foundation of relations between Beijing and Washington.
At their core, the agreements have collectively defined the framework through which both sides handle Taiwan, which has been one of the most persistent and intractable problems between Beijing and Washington since 1949.
Beijing sees Taiwan as part of China to be reunited by force if necessary.
Most countries, including the United States, do not recognise Taiwan as an independent state, but Washington is opposed to any attempt to take the self-ruled island by force and is committed to supplying it with weapons under the Taiwan Relations Act.
In the 1972 Shanghai Communique, which established the ground rules for Beijing-Washington cooperation, “the United States acknowledges that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China”.
Washington then formally shifted its diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing in the 1979 communique, but the US Congress passed the Taiwan Relations Act the same year.
Under the third and, so far, final communique with Beijing, signed in August 1982, the US government said it “intends gradually to reduce its sale of arms to Taiwan, leading, over a period of time, to a final resolution”.




However, while concluding negotiations with Beijing over the statement, former US president Ronald Reagan’s administration issued “Six Assurances” to Taiwan, pledging that Washington would continue backing the island’s security.
Those assurances’ formal content was adopted by both chambers of the US Congress in non-binding resolutions in 2016.
According to Zhu, it would be “completely unrealistic” to expect a Sino-US leadership summit to secure a US commitment to fully rule out support for Taiwan or to stop arms sales to it.
The crux of the issue lay in US domestic politics, he said, adding that American politicians had long used Taiwan as a crucial lever to score political points and build their reputations on policy toward Beijing.
“Can we now expect China and the US to reach a comprehensive political understanding or a new political consensus on the Taiwan question?” Zhu asked. “Personally, I think there is no realistic possibility of that.”
Referring to Trump’s remarks that he was “not looking to have somebody go independent” or looking to “travel 9,500 miles (about 15,300km) to fight a war”, Zhu said it was “already quite good” for the US leader to say that much.
On Thursday, the acting US navy secretary, Hung Cao, said a US$14 billion weapons sale to Taiwan was on “pause” owing to domestic munition demands, though the Pentagon later clarified that the final decision rested with Trump.
In response, Beijing on Friday said that its “firm opposition” to US arms sales to Taiwan was “consistent, clear and unwavering”.
During his talks with Trump on May 14, Xi said that “the Taiwan question is the most important issue in China-US relations”. He also emphasised that safeguarding peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait was the “biggest common denominator” between Beijing and Washington.
Zhu said Beijing was taking a “constructive” approach: the “biggest common denominator” was a “flexible” notion and sent an important signal to Washington that Beijing was not in a hurry to pursue reunification by force unless Taiwan independence forces crossed the red line.


China’s date with once-sanctioned Dutch trade minister on cards for early July: source

As Five Eyes allies boost Taiwan Strait transits, why is US going a different route?

Panama encourages dialogue and bridge-building at UN as canal tensions with China simmer

US to seek public comment on which Chinese goods qualify for lower tariffs, Greer says

US-China relations

Why the era of the 3 joint US-China communiques may be ‘completely’ over

Presidents Xi Jinping and Donald Trump in Beijing on May 14, during the American leader’s state visit to China. Photo: Kyodo

Taipei ‘optimistic’ about arms deal even after US Navy chief says it’s on ice

According to Wellington Koo (Ieft), Taiwan's defence minister, "the core interest involved here is peace in the Taiwan Strait, and peace in the Taiwan Strait is a core interest of the United States". Photo: CNA

People attend a rally to support government plans to increase defence spending, in Taipei on May 23. Photo: Reuters

Stable US-China ties? It won’t last long, Evan Medeiros says

Illustration: Henry Wong

Xi Jinping and Donald Trump stroll the grounds of Zhongnanhai in Beijing on May 15. Photo: AFP

Medeiros describes the trends in PLA operations around Taiwan as “worrisome”. Photo: Handout

China’s use of rare earth controls has sped up US diversification efforts. Photo: Reuters

Whiplash in Taiwan? How Donald Trump’s blunt warning collides with a historic call offer

US President Donald Trump speaks to reporters aboard Air Force One on the way back from Beijing on May 15. Photo: Getty Images via AFP

China’s then-premier Wen Jiabao (left) and US president George W. Bush wave as they walk to the Oval Office on December 9, 2003. Photo: AP

Chen Shui-bian, then leader of Taiwan, speaks in Taipei in October 2003. Photo: AP

US Navy signals pause in Taiwan arms sale, drawing swift reaction from Beijing

Acting Secretary of the US Navy Hung Cao has said Washington must pause a major arms sale to Taiwan to ensure it has enough munitions for its war on Iran. Photo: Reuters

Why a Trump call to Taiwan’s Lai could trigger ‘turbulence’ between Washington and Beijing

US President Donald Trump speaks to the press after stepping off Air Force One, at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, on Wednesday. Photo: AP

Taiwanese leader William Lai delivers a speech in Taipei on Wednesday. Photo: AP

News

China

Diplomacy

‘Unrealistic’ to expect Beijing and Washington to reach comprehensive understanding on Taiwan, prominent mainland analyst says


‘Unrealistic’ to expect Beijing and Washington to reach comprehensive understanding on Taiwan, prominent mainland analyst says.


United States

Taiwan

Xi Jinping

Donald Trump

Why the era of the 3 joint US-China communiques may be ‘completely’ over

.css-1c6uqr6{color:inherit;font-weight:inherit;font-size:inherit;font-family:inherit;line-height:inherit;overflow-wrap:break-word;}‘Unrealistic’ to expect Beijing and Washington to reach comprehensive understanding on Taiwan, prominent mainland analyst says

‘Unrealistic’ to expect Beijing and Washington to reach comprehensive understanding on Taiwan, prominent mainland analyst says