Will ‘Trump-class’ battleship be a sitting duck for Chinese carrier-killer missiles?
Aggressive schedule for nuclear-powered vessel may strain US shipyards and maritime industrial base, congressional budget amendment warns
A US congressional committee has cast doubt on Donald Trump’s “Golden Fleet” programme, warning it could overwhelm already strained nuclear-powered shipbuilding capacity and calling for a detailed review of its centrepiece battleship.
The congressional move comes amid growing doubts over whether Washington can successfully revive its naval industrial base to counter Beijing’s rapidly expanding fleet.
The House Armed Services Committee (HASC) voted to advance the national defence budget bill for 2027 on Friday (Thursday, US Eastern time), after passing several amendments.
One successful amendment was introduced by Congressman Joe Courtney, a Democrat, who called for the navy secretary to prepare a report by next March on how the planned BBG(X) nuclear-powered guided-missile battleship could be built without disrupting existing nuclear shipbuilding programmes.
“The committee is concerned about the possibility of strain on US nuclear shipyards and maritime industrial base posed by the aggressive schedule proposed for producing a nuclear-powered BBG(X) platform,” the amendment reads.
It noted that the United States had just two shipyards capable of building nuclear-powered vessels – of which only one had an active production line for surface vessels – and a single supplier of naval nuclear reactors.