Zero Covid still less costly than living with it, China’s top expert Zhong Nanshan says
- Opening up then reimposing restrictions when infections occur, as favoured in some countries, is more costly, he tells state media
- There have been questions over how long China should maintain its policy, with most of its people vaccinated and sporadic outbreaks difficult to prevent

“Some countries have decided to open up entirely despite still having a few infections,” Zhong said. “That led to a large number of infections in the past two months and they decided to reimpose restrictions. This flip-flopping approach is actually more costly. The psychological impact on citizens and society is greater.”

06:05
As more countries ditch ‘zero-Covid’ policy, why is China opting to ‘wait and see’?
Although Covid-19 cases have increased and deaths have been recorded in those countries, mass vaccination has limited the severity of symptoms and reduced the burden on health care systems.
Zhong said China’s approach was here to stay for a “considerably long time” but the exact duration would depend on how well other countries fared in containing the virus.