Advertisement
Advertisement
Science
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
The US ban on Xinjiang imports will have far-reaching effects on global supply chains, given the region’s status as a major producer of cotton and other manufacturing inputs. Photo: Xinhua

Scientists say Western sanctions against China ‘toothless’ without better supply chain data

  • Researchers call for global map of supply links between firms to help companies comply with trade restrictions
  • US ban on Xinjiang imports and EU directive to reduce human rights impacts difficult to enforce without transparency, they say
Science
Researchers in Europe and the US have called for the creation of an international map of supply connections between firms to improve transparency in global trade and help Western companies comply with sanctions.
“As policymakers increasingly recognise, supply chains are critical for ensuring compliance with tax laws, human rights and environmental standards,” the researchers said in an article published in the journal Science on Friday, citing US legislation to ban imports from Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region and the draft European Union Supply Chain Act as examples.

But “without better supply chain transparency, these acts will remain rather toothless,” said lead author Anton Pichler, a postdoctoral fellow at the Vienna-based research organisation Complexity Science Hub.

More than 300 million firms are connected through an estimated 13 billion supply links in the global economy, according to the team, which includes researchers from Complexity Science Hub, Vienna University of Economics and Business, University of Cambridge, University of Oxford, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Statistics Netherlands and Arizona State University.

US law banning Xinjiang imports has glaring weaknesses, lawmakers are told

The US has imposed economic sanctions on China over alleged human rights abuses, spying and supporting Russia’s war efforts in Ukraine, while other sanctions are aimed at curtailing China’s technological capabilities by restricting access to key suppliers.
On Tuesday, as Washington moved to further frustrate China’s progress in artificial intelligence, two of China’s best hopes for challenging American firms in the field of graphics processors were added to Washington’s so-called entity list, potentially barring their access to advanced foundries and US chip design software.

The US Uygur Forced Labor Prevention Act took effect last year to block the import of all goods sourced wholly or partly from Xinjiang in far western China.

The ban, which lasts for eight years, will have far-reaching effects on global supply chains, given Xinjiang’s status as a production hub for goods ranging from agricultural staples such as cotton and tomatoes to materials including viscose and polysilicon. These are among the “high-priority” products that will face scrutiny by US customs agents.

The EU directive, once finalised, would require European companies to identify, prevent and mitigate adverse human rights and environmental effects in their supply chains.

03:36

China restricts critical metal exports following Western semiconductor curbs in latest trade war

China restricts critical metal exports following Western semiconductor curbs in latest trade war

However, Pichler said it was difficult for US and European firms to know where production inputs come from, “which makes it similarly difficult to assess whether human rights violations have played a role in producing and shipping these inputs”.

“This makes the enforcement of these acts very difficult as long as there is no better transparency on supply chain relationships.”

He said a map of global supply networks would help identify particularly vulnerable supply relationships, and policymakers could create incentives for companies to diversify their suppliers.

According to the researchers, the lack of tools to analyse the global economy at the firm level has left the world ill-prepared to deal with crisis moments such as the shortages in raw materials and key medical supplies that occurred during the pandemic.

Other applications of a global supply chain map could include monitoring green transitions, reducing tax evasion and corruption, improving human rights through transparency and ensuring global security of food and medication, according to the paper.

Why is China’s manufacturing sector increasingly drawn to Vietnam?

China, the world’s second-largest economy, has been the world’s factory for over four decades. But that is starting to change.

Mexico replaced China this year as the top trading partner of the US – a result of strained US-China relations as well as the disruption of global supply chains caused by Beijing’s strict pandemic controls.

Last year, workers fled the world’s largest iPhone factory, operated by Foxconn Technology Group in central China, over fears of catching Covid-19.
The Taiwanese firm has since rapidly expanded its presence in India by investing in manufacturing facilities as the company seeks to move away from China.

On Thursday, Google announced that it would start manufacturing its Pixel smartphones in India. The company expects the first batch to hit the market next year.

Smaller manufacturers in industries such as footwear, clothing and toys have turned to Southeast Asia to reduce their reliance on China.

Building a global data sharing system would require international efforts and coordination by organisations such as the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, according to the paper.

“Since supply chain information is sensitive data, it is rather unlikely that countries with strained economic and political relationships will share this data with each other,” Pichler said.

He said one incentive to share data would be to enforce tax compliance. Firm-level data on trade across borders would also make it easier to detect fraud.

While he expects more countries will use the data to analyse their economies, sharing it would “require a common understanding and agreement of how to use this data”.

“We have been talking to various stakeholders at international organisations but so far, there is no general effort by these organisations to collect this data, which would vastly improve our understanding of the global economy.”

49