bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

corrections

sponsorType

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

publishedDate

additionalInfoBoxes

quizIds

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

createdDate

sponsor

paywallTypes

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Victoria Bela

Dannie Peng

China has published new guidelines on the use of generative artificial intelligence in scientific research, including a ban on the “direct” use of the technology when applying for research funding and approval.
The Guidelines For Responsible Research Conduct were released by the Ministry of Science and Technology on December 21, with the aim of promoting the “healthy development” of scientific research.
The guidelines cover various aspects of the research process, including topic selection and peer review, with ethics, safety and transparency the main considerations.
The rules apply to individual researchers and institutions, including universities and medical and health centres.
The guidelines set out a general framework for the use of AI, but do not provide detailed rules for specific situations.
One of the main concerns is the use of AI-generated content, which cannot be listed as a co-author under the new rules.
AI has helped researchers around the world make discoveries such as new antibiotics that may help fight drug-resistant superbugs and a Chinese team’s AI-generated catalysts that could help produce oxygen on Mars.
Some scientists have also listed AI tools such as ChatGPT as co-authors – a practice many journals have already stopped.
However, this has prompted discussions about whether AI should be credited if it discovers new materials or drugs – and even a broader philosophical debate about whether it should be considered equal to humans in the pursuit of knowledge.
ChatGPT-aided ransomware in China results in four arrests
Under the guidelines, generative AI can still be used in research, but any content or findings that use the technology must be clearly labelled as such.
Wen Shaoqing, an associate professor at Fudan University in Shanghai, said the effect of the regulations was likely to be “limited”, at least in his field of scientific archaeology, because generative AI “tends to produce poor-quality project application proposals” and few people will use it.
A biologist from the Chinese Academy of Sciences, who asked not to be named, also said she never uses AI to help her write proposals because these language models produce “beautiful but essentially meaningless words”.
However, another researcher from the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences said the widespread use of generative AI “is an irreversible trend” and it is unrealistic and unreasonable to ban it across the board.
The scientist, who also spoke on condition of anonymity, said researchers will continue to use it in research and grant applications if they think it will help them and it is more important to figure out “how to allow researchers to use it in an appropriate way and to … keep up with international trends”.


The rapid development of AI technology has “promoted profound changes in scientific research paradigms”, according to a document from the science ministry explaining the new rules.
However, it continued that the guidelines were needed because the technology has created problems around authorship, intellectual property and data processing.
According to the ministry, the guidelines draw on “useful foreign experiences and reflect international practices.”
It said the guidelines were based on a “broad consensus” in scientific circles, and will be updated and adjusted based on further technological developments.
Regulating the use of AI became a major focus for Beijing last year, both domestically and internationally.
Beijing launches AI platform to meet country’s rising demand for computing power
In April a meeting of the Politburo said it attached “great importance” to developing AI but highlighted the importance of risk prevention.
In August the country’s first regulations – the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services – came into effect with the aim of promoting “socialist values” and the “healthy” development of publicly available AI content.
These measures do not apply to scientific research institutes as long as they do not provide generative AI services to the Chinese public, according to the Cyberspace Administration of China.
At the start of November, China along with 27 other countries, including the United States, and the European Union, met in Britain to sign the Bletchley Declaration, an international pact on regulating the potentially “catastrophic” risks that could arise from rapidly developing AI.
China’s new scientific guidelines expand upon the interim measures. Apart from the ban on the direct use of AI when writing applications, the rules also say that AI-generated content and results must be labelled within the text “especially when it involves key content such as facts and opinions”.


AI-generated content should also be identified in the footnotes, methods section or appendices of research papers, along with explanations of how it was created and what software was used.
Any content that is marked as being generated by AI should not be treated as original literature, and if other authors want to cite this content “an explanation should be given”, the guidelines say.
They also state that any references generated by AI cannot be used unless they are verified first. A library guide from University College London has previously warned that generative AI may fabricate references and quotes.
A scientist from the Chinese Academy of Sciences working in organic chemistry said restrictions on AI-generated content are necessary because many graduate students now use it to write their theses, and he fears “it will ruin these students”.
The scientist, who asked not to be named, believes that such tools can make students lazier and makes it harder for them to develop original thinking skills.


China’s new Dawn: Pan Jianwei reveals high-orbit quantum satellite for global network

Chinese scientists develop gene-editing tool to target incurable diseases

China’s Feitian 2 hypersonic vehicle shows critical capabilities in test flight

Star mathematician Joshua Zahl leaves Canada for China after solving century-old puzzle

Science

China unveils new artificial intelligence guidelines for scientists and bans use in funding applications

AI is being increasing used in scientifc research. Photo: Shutterstock Images

Chinese generative AI to account for a third of industry’s economic value by 2035, Beijing think tank says

An AI sign seen at the World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai on July 6, 2023. Photo: Reuters

OpenAI in talks to raise new funding at US$100-billion valuation, making the ChatGPT creator one of the world’s most valuable start-ups

OpenAI’s rocketing valuation mirrors the artificial intelligence frenzy it kicked off one year ago after releasing ChatGPT. Photo: AP

Sam Altman, chief executive of OpenAI, at the Hope Global Forums annual meeting in Atlanta, Georgia on December 11, 2023. Photo: Bloomberg

News

China

The guidelines say AI cannot be credited as a co-author and any use of the technology for research purposes must be clearly labelled
Some scientists welcomed the move, with one saying he feared research students could be ‘ruined’ by misusing the technology


The guidelines say AI cannot be credited as a co-author and any use of the technology for research purposes must be clearly labelled.


Artificial intelligence

China technology

AI: Science

AI: Policy

China unveils new artificial intelligence guidelines for scientists and bans use in funding applications

The guidelines say AI cannot be credited as a co-author and any use of the technology for research purposes must be clearly labelled Some scientists welcomed the move, with one saying he feared research students could be ‘ruined’ by misusing the technology

The guidelines say AI cannot be credited as a co-author and any use of the technology for research purposes must be clearly labelled

Some scientists welcomed the move, with one saying he feared research students could be ‘ruined’ by misusing the technology