Advertisement
Advertisement
Science
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
According to the Standard Model, glueballs consist of gluons – a massless, “sticky” particle that bonds quarks together to form protons, neutrons and other components of matter in an interaction known as the strong nuclear force. Photo: Shutterstock

Did scientists just find the first ever glueball using Beijing’s particle collider?

  • After experiments at the Beijing Electron Positron Collider, physicists discovered particle X(2370) which they think may be a glueball
  • If it is the long-theorised glueball – a particle made entirely of gluons – it would go a long way to backing up the Standard Model
Science

An international team has found the strongest evidence yet for the existence of a theorised particle known as the “glueball”.

If confirmed, it could be the most exciting discovery in particle physics since the detection of the Higgs boson in 2012, and score another victory for the Standard Model, which is the best theory to describe the basic building blocks of the universe.

According to the Standard Model, glueballs consist entirely of gluons – a massless, “sticky” particle that bonds quarks together to form protons, neutrons and other components of matter in an interaction known as the strong nuclear force.

They are not only unique as the only particles made of pure force, but also elusive – no one has ever seen or detected one before.

Now, using the Beijing Electron Positron Collider, scientists have discovered the strongest candidate to date of a glueball – a particle named X(2370).
After using the collider to smash electrons and their antiparticles into each other at close to the speed of light, researchers then sifted through an enormous amount of data containing more than 10 billion collision samples before examining X(2370) closely.

Looking at its key properties, including its mass and spin, the team found it was a good match for those predicted in glueballs that comprise two gluons.

The research, which involved around 600 scientists across 17 countries, was detailed in a report this month in the journal Physical Review Letters.

“Glueball is a major prediction of the Standard Model, but they had never been experimentally discovered before,” study co-author Jin Shan from Nanjing University told state news agency Xinhua last weekend.
Schematic diagram of the X(2370) particle, which is believed to be the first evidence of a glueball. Photo: IHEP

“Our results are consistent with the features of the lightest glueballs predicted by the Standard Model, and therefore provide strong evidence in support of the existence of glueballs,” said Jin’s colleague Huang Yanping from the Institute of High Energy Physics in Beijing.

The researchers reported a 11.7-sigma statistical significance for their results. In particle physics, 5-sigma significance is the gold standard for announcing a bona fide discovery, meaning that there is a 0.00006 per cent chance for the study to be a statistical fluke.

While experimentalists celebrated the detection, theorists cautioned that more work was needed to confirm if those were pure glueballs, or glueballs mixed with conventional particles made from quarks.

“In the theoretical world where there are only gluons, but no quarks, glueballs are well-defined particles,” theoretical physicist Craig McNeile from the University of Plymouth in Britain, said on Wednesday.

“In the real world of quantum chromodynamics [one of the main theories behind nuclear physics], the glueball states will mix with particles made from quarks, and it is no longer clear whether an isolated glueball exists.”

Therefore, the X(2370) particles could be something else, such as an excited version of the so-called eta mesons, which are mostly made of quarks and antiquarks, he said.

Future experiments in China and Europe should be able to do more analysis and help rule out such scenarios if the particles were indeed isolated glueballs, he added.

Frank Close, emeritus professor of theoretical physics at Oxford University, hailed the study as “tantalising” and “encouraging”. However, he said the idea of a pure glueball was simplistic.

“This is at least an interesting step along the way,” Close said. “Until it is replicated in further experiments, I remain cautious.”

1