Advertisement
Advertisement
Hong Kong Basic Law
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
Hao Tiechuan. Photo: Sam Tsang

Public nomination was 'not accepted' in the 1980s, says state official

The right for voters to nominate chief executive candidates under universal suffrage was left out of the Basic Law because few people proposed or supported it, according to Beijing's Hong Kong propaganda chief.

Hao Tiechuan, publicity director of the central government's liaison office, cited records of the cross-border committee that drafted the Basic Law as well as the Hong Kong committee that sought local views.

"During the drafting and consulting processes of the Basic Law, the University of Hong Kong students' union was the only organisation that proposed allowing voters to directly nominate the chief executive candidates," Hao wrote in an article in the .

"The proposal was not widely accepted by various sectors and the drafting committee members, [so it] was eventually not put into the Basic Law," wrote Hao.

But Martin Lee Chu-ming, a member of the Basic Law drafting committee, said the fact public nomination was not proposed at the time did not mean it contravened the mini-constitution.

"In my view, the Basic Law allows the flexibility for the introduction of public nomination," he said.

Tam Yiu-chung, also a member of the drafting committee, said debate at the time had focused on the transition from the election committee to the nominating committee under universal suffrage.

"Only a handful raised questions on the nomination issue," said Tam.

Former members of the Basic Law consultative committee said Hao should consider the current public backing for the proposal.

"China's constitution is amended frequently as well," said pan-democrat lawmaker Frederick Fung Kin-kee.

Occupy Central organiser Benny Tai Yiu-ting, a student representative at the University of Hong Kong in the 1980s, said the Basic Law says neither yes nor no to the concept of public nomination, allowing for flexibility.

 

This article appeared in the South China Morning Post print edition as: Public choice 'not accepted' in '80s
Post