bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

paywallTypes

corrections

sponsorType

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

publishedDate

additionalInfoBoxes

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

createdDate

sponsor

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Ng Kang-chung

Beijing’s tightening of ideological control has spilled across the border and threatens Hong Kong’s press freedom, according to an annual report citing the bookseller controversy as the “most blatant example” of this.
The Hong Kong Journalists Association (HKJA) also decried the trend of local media outlets being “occupied” by people close to Beijing.
Perception of Hong Kong press freedom declines for second year, according to Journalists Association survey
The 32-page report, titled One Country, Two Nightmares, covered major incidents in local media over the past year, including the closure of Asia Television and the University of Hong Kong seeking an injunction to bar journalists from revealing details of its governing council meetings.
HKJA chairwoman Sham Yee-lan said her group saw the Causeway Bay Books case as the most blatant attack on speech and press freedoms in the city.
“The press will be frightened off from writing or publishing stuff that may be deemed as being unacceptable to China,” Sham said.
Five Hong Kong-based booksellers dealing in publications banned from the mainland went missing one after another from last October. They later re-appeared across the border, where they were detained and made televised confessions, while claiming to be co-operating with a mainland security investigation.
Censorship at the South China Morning Post: fact, fiction and fallacy
Four have since returned to Hong Kong. One of them, Lam Wing-kee, went public last month to decry threats to the “one country, two systems” principle.
“This has had an undoubted adverse impact on freedom of expression and press freedom in Hong Kong,” the report said.
The report also touched on the acquisition of local media outlets by mainland businesses, citing the purchase of the South China Morning Post by mainland internet conglomerate Alibaba Group as an example.
In a letter to readers last December, Alibaba Group executive vice-chairman Joseph Tsai rejected such criticism, saying it “reflects a bias of its own, as if to say newspaper owners must espouse certain views, while those that hold opposing views are unfit”.


Mainland China ideological crackdown hits Hong Kong, says Journalists Association

Journalists Association chairwoman Sham Yee-lan expresses concern over press freedom. Photo: Dickson Lee

News

Hong Kong

Education

Union decries trend of local media outlets being “occupied” by people close to Beijing
