Liberal studies books should be vetted, think tank by former Hong Kong leader says, but teachers feel otherwise
- Our Hong Kong Foundation, founded by Tung Chee-hwa, says controversial subject’s books should be scrutinised by government to avoid purported bias
- Survey of teachers, however, finds only 21 per cent feel current books have problems with unbalanced content
Most of the teaching materials for the controversial liberal studies subject should be vetted by the government in the long run to ensure there is no bias, according to a think tank founded by a former Hong Kong leader who described the curriculum as a “failure”.
But a survey by Our Hong Kong Foundation found 43 per cent of liberal studies teachers opposed the idea of scrutinising textbooks, while almost half did not think there was a problem with the impartiality of existing materials.
The think tank, founded by former chief executive Tung Chee-hwa, also suggested on Monday that while liberal studies should remain a compulsory subject in high school, grading should be switched to a simple pass or fail to allow pupils more flexibility.
Introduced as a core subject for senior secondary students in 2009, liberal studies has become controversial in recent years, with pro-establishment groups saying some teaching materials are biased while politicians blame it for making pupils more radical.
The Education Bureau introduced a “voluntary consultation service” last year, with the first batch of vetted liberal studies textbooks in use this term removing some politically sensitive cartoons and phrases such as “separation of powers” in the description of the city’s governing system.
Critics said the changes were “political censorship”, an accusation the bureau dismissed.
The foundation proposed the government vet the books to ensure accuracy and objectivity, and said pupils should avoid getting their information only from news and social media. But it also said there was no need for school-based materials prepared by individual teachers to be checked.
Education chief denies changes to textbooks amount to political censorship
Stephen Wong Yuen-shan, the think tank’s deputy executive director and head of its public policy institute, said originally there was no scrutiny or vetting because the subject had been designed to encourage teachers not to use textbooks.
“But the reality is that most of the teachers … are actually using them,” Wong told a press conference. “Therefore, we thought that it would make sense to align this subject just like any other subjects in Hong Kong high schools where the textbooks would be vetted by officials.”
The think tank said the bureau should make transparent and practical vetting guidelines public while the scrutiny should ideally also cover workbooks and listening materials.
Wong cited a foundation-commissioned survey conducted by Lingnan University’s public governance programme between May and July this year, which showed 87 per cent of the 484 liberal studies teachers polled relied on textbooks as one of their main teaching materials and 39 per cent used social media as their primary teaching sources.
The survey, however, also found only 21 per cent of teachers believed there was a problem with views being biased in existing liberal studies textbooks. Nearly 50 per cent said otherwise.
More than 43 per cent said they disagreed or strongly disagreed that the bureau should examine textbooks to ensure the views expressed were neutral and balanced. About 39 per cent either supported or strongly supported the idea.
In the same survey, about 33 per cent of the 71 principals polled found the textbooks were impartial, while 11 per cent disagreed. More than 83 per cent, however, supported government textbook vetting to ensure the content was balanced.
Report lead adviser Wong Yuk-shan, president of Open University and a National People‘s Congress deputy, meanwhile, said although nearly 80 per cent of teachers used newspapers and magazines as teaching materials, many news reports were “biased” and not a form of knowledge.
“These biased and sensational reports cannot help students distinguish right from wrong,” Wong said.
The think tank also suggested that the subject’s current grading system – based on seven levels from 1 to 5**, the top mark – should be changed to a pass or fail. It said that could let pupils “get the most out of the learning process”.
Students would then “be able to find motivation beyond a readily quantifiable and subjective grade to engage in self-directed learning, self-assessment and self-regulation”.
Student, teacher groups demand explanation of new vetting for liberal studies books
Tin Fong-chak, a liberal studies teacher for a decade and vice-president of the 100,000-strong Professional Teachers’ Union, however, disagreed with changing the grading system. Many pupils could lose the motivation to study as a result, he said.
Tin also said the mandatory scrutinising of textbooks could lead to “content inclined to supporting the government”.
“If every textbook has to be endorsed by the authorities then, in other words, we no longer can discuss many topics in classrooms,” he said.
A bureau spokeswoman said its task force would submit a final review report on the school curriculum, including liberal studies, to the bureau this month, and adjustments would be considered.
