National security education in Hong Kong about nurturing positive values and sense of Chinese identity, not reciting laws, teachers told
- About 1,600 educators attend first talk delivered by member of government’s steering committee on the subject
- But some participants say they gained little understanding about how to change their approach in the classroom to avoid running afoul of new law
National security education in Hong Kong schools should not be aimed at making students recite laws but rather helping them nurture positive values and their Chinese identity, a legal expert told educators on Monday at the first government-run seminar for teachers on the legislation.
Participation in the closed-door seminar, titled “National security and our daily lives” and which ran for two and a half hours, was voluntary.
It was the bureau’s first one to explain the national security law to teachers, and one of the electives under a 30-hour mandatory training scheme on professional conduct and national development being rolled out this year.
According to two teachers present at the seminar, Lee said national security education was not aimed at having pupils recite the entire law but rather instilling positive values and a sense of identity with China.
“In terms of national security education, when one has a strong identity towards the country, one would naturally be concerned about its safety, and thus his or her acts would naturally be in line with protecting its society and national security,” the teachers quoted Lee as saying.
Lee also said in terms of education, the deterrent effect of the law – which can carry a life sentence in the most serious cases – was not the focus, according to the teachers.
One year since campus protests, Hong Kong’s universities are not the same
“The more ideal scenario is that when [students] understand that [national security] is good for society and is a responsibility to others, they would not commit illegal acts or activities that could damage the community,” he said.
Lee reportedly stressed that chanting slogans was still covered by freedom of speech, as the national security law had a high legal threshold on whether the slogans involved incitement.
But he added that if an act was done intentionally with the expectation that others would follow, it would likely be illegal.
Lee did not go into details about how teachers should avoid breaching the new law in the classroom.
01:16
Four enter US consulate after national security police arrest HK activist planning asylum bid
Two teachers who attended the talk said they took little away from the seminar in terms of how teachers should change their approach.
“I think the seminar did not provide much help for teachers in terms of what can or cannot be taught in classrooms,” he said. “For instance, it lacked a focus on what teachers should pay attention to during class with the national security law in place.”
National security law tip line gets 10,000 messages in first week of operation
“When teachers are so far not given any detailed guidance, we are concerned about whether certain parts of our class or any worksheets we made would breach the red line of the Education Bureau,” he said. “There are still many grey areas [under the law].”
Another teacher said: “I had hoped to learn a bit more insights on how teachers can adjust under the law, but the seminar could not help us much in that area.”
But an attendee said he felt he “had learned more” about the concepts of the law through the seminar. He would further review student activities that touched on topics related to nurturing positive values and attitudes about national identity, the primary school principal said.