Advertisement
Advertisement
Hong Kong politics
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
Lawmakers are expected to take up Article 23 legislation, first proposed two decades ago, either this year or early in 2024. Photo: Yik Yeung-man

Hong Kong’s Article 23 national security law to define state secrets according to city’s needs, minister says

  • Administration to take reference from other countries and mainland China but use definition that reflects local situation, Secretary for Security Chris Tang says
  • Beijing on Wednesday revealed expansions to country’s Law on Guarding State Secrets

National security legislation planned for Hong Kong will define state secrets according to local needs, the security chief has said, two days after Beijing announced it will make the biggest revision to the corresponding law in mainland China in a decade.

Lawmakers are expected to take up the legislation, first proposed two decades ago, either this year or in 2024, according to a timeline that city leader John Lee Ka-chiu confirmed in this week’s policy address.

When asked whether Hong Kong would follow the mainland’s definition of state secrets during the drafting stage, Secretary for Security Chris Tang Ping-keung said the city government would tailor its law to suit local conditions.

“On the definition of state secrets, of course we would look at Hong Kong’s situation, but also reference definitions from laws in other countries, as well as that in mainland laws,” Tang said. “We have to observe Hong Kong’s actual situation to establish a definition.”

“Our laws must be able to face past risks, especially those in the likes of the black violence seen in 2019,” Secretary for Security Chris Tang says. Photo: Yik Yeung-man
The national security legislation is required under Article 23 of the city’s mini-constitution, the Basic Law, and will sit alongside the one Beijing imposed following anti-government protests in 2019.

Beijing revealed expansions to the country’s Law on Guarding State Secrets on Wednesday, extending the depth and reach of its coverage across education, technology, the internet and the military, among other areas.

The planned changes, which would be the biggest to the law in a decade, have raised concerns among foreign businessmen over what will constitute state secrets.

The amendments included a clause that would prohibit state employees who had access to classified information from travelling overseas without prior approval, even after they leave the job or retire. The time period for that prohibition has not been revealed.

The mainland law does not currently define who is considered an employee with access to state secrets.

American firms not leaving Hong Kong, but worries persist: top US envoy in city

The amendments were expected to be passed by the National People’s Congress, the top legislature on the mainland, after a second reading, which is expected to happen soon.

Regina Ip Lau Suk-yee, convenor of the key decision-making Executive Council, said in June the city’s national security provisions under Article 23 should not adopt the mainland’s definition of state secrets so as to protect freedom of information, which was key to Hong Kong’s financial hub status.

Ip was security chief when the administration first tried to pass Article 23 legislation in 2003, but was forced to shelve the draft after more than 500,000 people took to the streets to vent their opposition on July 1, the anniversary of the city’s transfer from British to Chinese rule.

Hong Kong’s Legislative Council building is surrounded by demonstrators during a candlelight vigil in Central in July 2003. Around 50,000 protesters gathered to show their disapprobal of city Chief Executive Tung Chee-hwa and his handling of the Article 23 anti-subversion bill. Photo: K.Y. Cheng

Reiterating city leader Lee’s promise in the policy address, Tang said his bureau would finish work on the legislation by the end of next year, emphasising that it would only target a small proportion of the population.

According to the security chief, the legislation would be different from the 2003 draft, as the risks the city faced had changed in recent years.

“Our laws must be able to face past risks, especially like those in the black violence seen in 2019,” Tang said, referring to the months-long anti-government protests.

Three offences in the current national security law would duplicate charges covered under Article 23 – secession, subversion against the central government and collusion with a foreign country or with external elements to endanger national security.

National security: what is Article 23 and why is it back in the spotlight?

The existing national security law also outlaws terrorist activities in the city.

When asked how the new law under Article 23 would affect regulation and sentencing guidelines for crimes also covered in other existing laws, Tang said: “Existing laws do not suffice to target previous risk, as well as some future risks, hence we need to evaluate these laws in order to bolster their effectiveness in tackling these risks.”

As a part of the Security Bureau’s work to boost national security education, it planned to train no less than 2,600 district-based tutors to raise public awareness.

Each tutor would be expected to teach 30 students, picked from youth leaders or public organisations, as Tang estimated at least 78,000 residents in the programme.

3