Advertisement

Something else may be spreading in Hong Kong amid coronavirus outbreak and anti-government protests – ‘xenophobia’ against mainland Chinese

  • Scholars warn that Hong Kong’s already politically charged climate is an ideal breeding ground for opposing sides to use health crisis for their goals
  • Anti-mainland sentiment reaches new heights, with ‘yellow’ shops discriminating against Mandarin speakers, and quarantined students doxxed

Reading Time:7 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
99+
People in masks in front of a screen broadcasting a message by Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam. Photo: AP

As Hong Kong treads gingerly in the grip of the coronavirus outbreak, with most avoiding going out and office staff told to work from home, negative sentiments against one group of people are more pronounced than ever.

The wariness of mainland Chinese comes against the backdrop of soaring numbers of infection across the border. As of Monday, more than 17,000 cases have been reported in mainland China, with over 360 deaths. Hong Kong recorded its 15th confirmed case on Sunday.

Analysts said while it was understandable that people would want to isolate themselves from mainlanders to reduce risks of infection, in Hong Kong, the situation had been politicised by government opponents.

Anti-mainland sentiments, simmering in recent years and brought to the fore in the ongoing protests sparked by the now-withdrawn extradition bill last June, have found new momentum amid the health crisis, seeding a fertile environment for full-blown xenophobia to take root in the city, some warned.
Embattled city leader Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor, who earlier announced partial border closures with the mainland, is under immense pressure to roll out a complete shutdown. But she has so far rejected calls for this, saying it would be discriminatory.

“I hope that as the whole of society takes part in prevention of and fighting the disease, we can be tolerant ... rather than targeting or rejecting a particular group,” she said, citing the World Health Organisation’s position that draconian travel and trade restrictions were not necessary.

Advertisement