Hong Kong’s air quality on the mend, but most pollutant concentration levels ‘still fall short of WHO goals’
- Most major pollutant concentration levels in the city fell short of WHO standards, with only sulphur dioxide meeting the global body’s targets last year
- Environmental Protection Department says city’s air quality has been improving over the last 10 years, with the past two showing the best results
Only one pollutant, sulphur dioxide, had a concentration low enough to meet the WHO standard for the maximum allowable level last year, according to the Environmental Protection Department.
“Hong Kong’s air quality has been improving over the last 10 years, with the past two years having the best air quality,” Dr Kenneth Leung Kai-ming, assistant director of the department, said during a press conference on Friday.
While the pandemic had contributed to reduced transport and in turn better air quality over the past two years, especially during the first half of 2020, Leung said improvement had started before the outbreak.
“The Covid impact during the first half of 2020 was bigger than its impact for the entire 2021, but the air quality of 2021 was still better than that of 2019,” he said. “From the long-term perspective, the improvement trend has sustained.”
The air quality data recorded by the department’s monitoring stations showed that the annual average concentrations of respirable suspended particulates (PM10), fine suspended particulates (PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and sulphur dioxide (SO2) in the ambient air fell by 32 per cent to 62 per cent between 2011 and 2021.
The annual average concentrations of the pollutants at the roadside were reduced by 43 per cent to 58 per cent during the period.
As for last year, the level of all four major pollutants met the city’s own air quality objectives, which are benchmarked against the WHO’s interim goals. Only SO2 levels met the WHO’s ultimate goals.
The 24-hour average concentration of SO2 was 16 micrograms per cubic metre, compared with the WHO’s ultimate target of 40 micrograms per cubic metre.
The WHO tightened the maximum allowable pollutant levels for its goals in 2021.
Brian Lau Man-pang, principal environmental protection officer of the department, admitted at the press conference that Hong Kong’s air quality objectives were more relaxed than the WHO’s, but he said the city would review the objectives and catch up with the global standards.
“Hong Kong will tighten its air quality objectives in a gradual manner to meet the WHO’s standards,” he said.
In addition, Hong Kong’s annual average concentration of ozone (O3) rose over the past 10 years, with the level recorded in the general stations up from 41 micrograms per cubic metre in 2011 to 55 micrograms per cubic metre last year.
Leung said tackling the regional O3 emission would be a challenge, as Hong Kong’s O3 level was also affected by that of neighbouring cities.
The department has started reviewing the air quality objectives to assess the scope for further tightening them to catch up with the WHO’s. The review is expected to be completed next year.
Leung laid out a series of measures to continue improving the city’s air quality, including promoting the use of electric vehicles and other green transport, updating the air quality objectives, and enhancing regional collaboration.
The department’s data also showed that visibility in Hong Kong had improved, with 258 hours of reduced visibility detected last year, down by 84 per cent from 1570 hours in 2004.
Patrick Fung Kin-wai, CEO of the Hong Kong NGO Clean Air Network, said while the data showed a long-term improving trend of the city’s air quality, progress had slowed in recent years, especially after 2018.
Fung said the city’s air pollution could rebound when transport gradually resumed as the pandemic situation stabilised. Increased emissions from ageing vehicles also posed a problem.
Fung urged the government to establish a detailed road map for achieving zero-carbon emission, form concrete strategies as soon as possible before 2025, and set up a clear time frame to tighten the air quality objectives once the review was completed.