bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

paywallTypes

corrections

sponsorType

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

publishedDate

additionalInfoBoxes

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

createdDate

sponsor

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Sum Lok-kei

A human rights group has accused Hong Kong police of breaking with protocol on the use of body-worn cameras during two protest marches in July and October.
Civil Rights Observer published its first report on Sunday after training volunteers to monitor interaction between officers and demonstrators.
The group sent 12 observers to the city’s annual July 1 march at which organisers this year estimated the crowd numbered 50,000.
Three volunteers also monitored the October 1 National Day march that drew about 1,500 protesters.
The observers said they saw police filming peaceful demonstrators on both occasions. However, a 2015 report by the Independent Police Complaints Council (IPCC) says recording should only be carried out for crime detection and for reviewing how events are policed.

At the July 1 event the group says it saw four plain-clothes officers following and filming two protesters holding a Hong Kong colonial-era flag for 39 minutes in Wan Chai.
“These two demonstrators did not conduct any acts that were not peaceful or which may have been illegal,” the rights report said.
The volunteers also saw police recording two marchers who gave political speeches that day.
On October 1 the observers witnessed seven officers filming peaceful marchers in Causeway Bay.
Hong Kong pan-democrats raise privacy concerns as police plan body-worn cameras for all frontline officers by 2021
Icarus Wong Ho-yin said the 2015 IPCC report stipulated the subject of video recordings should normally be an event as a whole, and that individuals became the subject “only when there is a breach of the peace”.
“But in reality, the police do not behave like that,” he said.
Videoing rallies may deter people from joining, Wong added.
“A protester might think: ‘Will they come after me later? Why are the officers filming me?’ Subjectively speaking, it makes protesters feel threatened.”

Fellow Civil Rights Observer member Andrew Shum Wai-nam said it was not uncommon for democracy activists to become the target of police.
“If a protester is expressing his or her views in a peaceful manner … I don’t see the need for such monitoring,” Shum said.
US states plan police body camera legislation after deaths of unarmed blacks
His organisation urged the force to publish in full its protocol for filming with body-worn cameras, since the 2015 report had only partially disclosed details, they said. Police were also told to reveal how they handle the video footage they capture.
The protocol states video should be destroyed within three months unless required for investigations or as evidence in court.
Wong said the rights group would file a complaint with the Complaints Against Police Office in the near future about the July 1 cases.
The reports on the marches would be sent to police, the IPCC and the legislature’s security panel, he added.


Deadly Israeli strikes mar fragile Gaza truce

Indonesia, Saudi Arabia agree on new labour protections

What Duterte’s arrest means for Philippine politics – and its global standing

US hits Thai officials with visa sanctions over deportation of Uygurs to China

Human rights

Hong Kong police broke with protocol on body cameras at protests, rights group says

At the July 1 march the rights group claims it saw four plain-clothes officers following and filming two protesters holding a Hong Kong colonial-era flag. Photo: Sum Lok-kei

Members of the Civil Rights Observer Icarus Wong Ho-yin(L) and Charles Tsang Wing attend the Civil Rights Observer press conference on the releases of two observation reports on whether police had violated human rights in the handling the marches on July 1st and October 1st this year. 16DEC18 SCMP/ Jonathan Wong

Member of the Civil Rights Observer Charles Tsang Wing attend the Civil Rights Observer press conference on the releases of two observation reports on whether police had violated human rights in the handling the marches on July 1st and October 1st this year. 16DEC18 SCMP/ Jonathan Wong

News

Hong Kong

Law and Crime

Civil Rights Observer says four plain-clothes officers followed and filmed two protesters holding a British colonial-era flag at July 1 march, despite the pair posing no threat


Civil Rights Observer says four plain-clothes officers followed and filmed two protesters holding a British colonial-era flag at July 1 march, despite the pair posing no threat.


Hong Kong police

July 1 march