Advertisement
Advertisement
Hong Kong courts
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
One of the defendants arrives at Sha Tin Magistrates’ Court on Thursday. Photo: Dickson Lee

Hong Kong policemen in court on suspicion of assault as magistrate questions appropriateness of charges

  • Pair in court alongside former officer for first time in connection with incident involving 62-year-old man at city’s North District Hospital
  • Constables Au Kwok-wai and Tang Man-him, and fellow defendant Lam Yik-sing, facing assault charges

A magistrate has questioned the appropriateness of charges brought against two police officers and a former officer accused of assaulting a 62-year-old man in a public hospital.

Constables Au Kwok-wai, 25, and Tang Man-him, 24, made their first appearance at Sha Tin Magistrates’ Court on Thursday, alongside fellow defendant Lam Yik-sing, 30, two days after being arrested on suspicion of assaulting Chung Chi-wah inside room 7A of North District Hospital, in Sheung Shui, on June 26.

Hospital signs cast doubt on police claims over delay to assault inquiry

The case is not related to the anti-government protests sweeping the city.

Au and Tang face a joint charge of assault occasioning actual bodily harm, while Lam is charged with conspiracy to commit assault occasioning actual bodily harm. The maximum penalty for the charges is three years in jail.

Chung Chi-wah (centre), flanked by Democratic Party community officer Edward Kwok Long-fung (left) and lawmaker Lam Cheuk-ting, leaves police headquarters in Wan Chai on Wednesday after making a formal complaint against officers. Photo: Nora Tam

Acting principal magistrate Ko Wai-hung noted a psychological report on the victim had not played a part in prosecutors’ thinking, and asked them if they would like to seek one for Chung.

“This is to determine the appropriateness of the charges,” Ko said, adding that it would give a comprehensive picture when considering the charge, though he made it clear he was merely making an observation, not a suggestion.

The magistrate’s comment came after some members of the public suggested the trio should have faced more serious charges, after the case first came to light two days ago.

Hong Kong policemen arrested over assault on drunken detainee, 62

A representative for the Department of Justice said it had not been able to contact Chung to get his consent for a psychological examination.

From the dock, Au looked over to the public gallery, while Tang and Lam, who resigned from the force after the incident, kept their heads low, staring at the metal fence which separated them from the rest of the courtroom.

Ko adjourned the case to October 17 to allow time for the police investigation to continue, and for lawyers to obtain various medical reports on Chung.

He granted all three defendants cash bail of HK$10,000 and ordered them not to leave Hong Kong.

At a press conference later in the day, John Tse Chun-chung, chief superintendent of the Police Public Relations Branch, was asked by reporters why the officers did not face the more serious charge of torture.

“The offence the three were arrested for, will not necessarily be the same charge in future,” Tse said. “After the arrest, we will conduct a full investigation, collect evidence and seek advice from the Department of Justice before we finalise the charge.”

Democratic Party lawmaker Lam Cheuk-ting also questioned the current charges, saying they did not “reflect the severity of the incident”.

The lawmaker said he would push the Department of Justice for torture charges.

Additional reporting by Alvin Lum

This article appeared in the South China Morning Post print edition as: Magistrate questions assault charges
Post