Advertisement
Hong Kong national security law
Hong KongLaw and Crime

National security law: Hong Kong court rejects challenge to new bail rules brought by man who allegedly drove motorcycle into police

  • High Court judges dealing with the unprecedented challenge rule suspect’s detention ‘cannot be said to be without lawful authority’
  • The team for Tong Ying-kit had argued that Article 42 of the new legislation was inconsistent with the Basic Law and amounted to a ‘no bail’ provision

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Tong Ying-kit exits Lai Chi Kok Reception Centre en route to court. Photo: Handout
Jasmine Siu
The High Court has thrown out the first constitutional challenge to detention on charges under Hong Kong’s new national security law, with the two designated judges calling the application for habeas corpus a wrong procedure while dismissing criticisms about their independence.

But Tong Ying-kit, 23, the first defendant charged under the new law, has not given up on seeking release from custody, and the Court of First Instance will hear his ordinary bail application on Tuesday, when he will be represented by a different legal team led by Lawrence Lok SC.

Justices Anderson Chow Ka-ming and Alex Lee Wan-tang on Friday sided with the government in concluding that Tong’s application for a writ of habeas corpus – for the authorities to justify the legality of his detention – should not be permitted as “there can be no doubt that the magistrate had the lawful authority” to remand him.

Advertisement

“We cannot see any good reason why the applicant does not apply for a review of refusal of bail in the normal way,” the judges wrote in a 43-page judgment. “There can be no question of his detention being without lawful authority.”

Tong Ying-kit is accused of riding his motorcycle into a group of police officers at a July 1 protest. Photo: Cable TV
Tong Ying-kit is accused of riding his motorcycle into a group of police officers at a July 1 protest. Photo: Cable TV
Advertisement
The case raised fundamental questions about the relative status of the Basic Law, the city’s mini-constitution, and the new security legislation, and how any inconsistency between the two national laws should be dealt with by Hong Kong courts. But neither of the questions were answered as the judges found it was not necessary for the disposition of Tong’s application.
Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x